Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No that's the rub I'd have to buy it , there are a lot cheaper ones around so ill have to look into it, but those tune results I posted the other day were my car with a programable ecu an a tune, that's all that's missing from getting into the 280rwkw range, but he said 230-240 would be safe as houses to run with the current running gear already there.

Daryl it really depends on what you want out of it.
Best bang for buck is going to be the nistune.

I honestly think you need to sit down and work out exactly what your plan is.

Otherwise you are going to have all these mismatched parts and no idea of what you actually want.

Set yourself a goal and then research how to get there.

Are you looking to get to that power goal the easy and cheap way or the safer and more expensive way.

I made the mistake of focusing purely on power and neglecting handling, braking and general maintenance.

This left me with a 250kw car that feels like shit to drive these days.

Parts need to talk with each other or else they're just junk in the trunk huehue.

I suggest talking with someone (with knowledge) and aim for a power outlet - If you're wanting 300kW then ask a specialist on what supporting mods you need to get that.

Figure out what you want in the end game and work towards it - it's not a cheap journey.

cheers

Edited by RosieR34

Just got hold of the guy that did up the car, he spent 13000$ on it

It has an adjustable arm on the antenuator to a just boost so a just nut back toward cabin lower , towards front end higher boost , he had it tuned with the stock ecu with the tune stats I posted an has a 12.5 quarter mile printout ,

2 cowboys owned it between him to me, in a 5 month space of time , turbo is high flowed an will handle 18psi but he only ever had it at 11.

so if they didn't mess up to much in that 5 month gap , I'm on a good thing

Nitrous?

Blanked off hole in the crossover pipe would be a sign of nitrous use.

That can flog the crap out of a motor, especially if the timing isnt retarded at least 5 degrees.

Might have got number wrong but he knew everything, he sold it for 7.5 then 2 goon had it in a 5 month period before me.

But from what ultimate told me yesterday it's all there to put down real power. ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...