Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i suppose we tend to forget that in japan the skyline is just another car among many others for people to choose. thats why there are so many r32 and r33's coming into aus because of the amount of them on the road. I think i read somewhere that in the first month that the V35 was on sale in japan they moved about 6500 vehicles if you look at that compared to how many lancers are sold in a month over here i am sure that will provide an interesting comparison. :P

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

correct me if im wrong... but aint jap cars only allowed to come out with no more then 280hp? if so....
Yeah, you're wrong... it USED to be 280ps. But that whole egntleman agreement between manufacturers about maximum power went out with the 20th century...
hey rezz are you trying to beat evo lee to post because he keeps beating you at pool??
Hahahaha... VERY funny :wassup:

Troy is the original die-cast moulding of the ultimate jaggy bastard... :P

Without Mivec it is already the most highly powered 2L engine but I will have to see what the actual power figures of the new EJ20T on a dyno.  With a mild dose of Mivec it will get 350ps from the crank easy but that means they have done nothing much to the engine :P, I just hope it will be as light as the MR.

Isn't it 4G63T?

The design looks a tad wierd imo, but I guess it'll grow on me as did the 350Z

Yes always a 4G63 :P

Even without any form of MIVEC she still has plenty more in her.

That photos is probably just some normal 4cyc Mivec in the normal Lancer.

As for the gentlemen's agreement I thought we all know that was thrown out the window ages ago...makers just state that to keep the Govt happy.

What's the point with the EVO, it just looks like a riced up Lancer to the average joe. How much were they, like 70k or something? ridiculous. Small, ugly and overpriced. Might go fast but so what? It's about as appealing as a high performance Hyundai Excel.

Sorry EVO owners, but for that money Mitsubishi really should give it it's own body and model look, not that of a mass produced budget car runabout.

Sorry EVO owners, but for that money Mitsubishi really should give it it's own body and model look, not that of a mass produced budget car runabout.
Bloody hell, EVERYBODY thats had a ride in Evo_Lee's Evo 5 walks away highly impressed (Troy - really they do!)...

You been in one/driven one before mate? I've said it before, Mitsubishi Evo's are the *only* other car I'd think about owning other than a Skyline.

Bloody hell, EVERYBODY thats had a ride in Evo_Lee's Evo 5 walks away highly impressed (Troy - really they do!)...

You been in one/driven one before mate? I've said it before, Mitsubishi Evo's are the *only* other car I'd think about owning other than a Skyline.

i like the 04 WRX STi much better, looks so much better..... but nothin beats the look of a tank GTR

i suppose we tend to forget that in japan the skyline is just another car among many others for people to choose. thats why there are so many r32 and r33's coming into aus because of the amount of them on the road. I think i read somewhere that in the first month that the V35 was on sale in japan they moved about 6500 vehicles if you look at that compared to how many lancers are sold in a month over here i am sure that will provide an interesting comparison. :)

Plus there is all the cooking model cars we don't get here (like a RB20E in a R33 2door...how many people here bother importing them?)

I like the look of the specs for the Evo X, the car though... yuck...designed by the guy who was recently sacked? (and responsible for such ugly things as the current Magna, that Colt thing, cooking model Lancers(agreed, the Evo 8 wasn't too bad))

i like the 04 WRX STi much better, looks so much better..... but nothin beats the look of a tank GTR

The STi package is great but the styling leaves alot to be desired...again Aust gets alot of WRXs and STi...you don't see many around here definitely not in my neck of the woods. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

If you have time search for the Super Taikyu Series and you will see alot of nice racing Evos and the most...2 STi in the whole field...then you will see which is better looking even in race trim.

Ofcourse the skyline was mass produced evo_lee... what car that u can buy isnt..

But u count the number of lancers that go past on a busy street compared to the number of GTRs or even GTSt skylines. :)

And we are talking australia here, it is skylines australia :)

My against for the EVO is simply the fact it looks too similar to a normal lancer, which in no way is a performance car anyway. So u cant say the GTR is just a riced up gtst. The entire range of skylines is performance bred, but lancers;

One side is cheap cars to be mass produced, the other peformance.

And brand new they are fairly expensive.

I beleive for a car to be truely unique, it needs the whole package.. Looks, power, handling, agressive, price, attractive etc etc

Other than that tho, the EVOs are fast!

I don't necessarily agree - Lancers are by and large, shitty cheaply made economy boxes for univerisity students and middle aged women... oh and ricers :)

But Evolutions have a strong racing heritage easily comparable to GT-R's. I wouldn't be spending $75,000 on an EVO but to the people that matter, the EVO will always stand way above a 'normal' Lancer.

T.

The entire range of skylines is performance bred

entire range??

read up on motorsport history(pre-WRC) and you'll know why the Evolution had to be based on a "mass production" car.

that goes for the GT-R too.....

funny how no one is comparing the WRC Focus rally car to their road-going versions...

Looks like everyones has jumped in and answered before I could finish my post...

Ofcourse the skyline was mass produced evo_lee... what car that u can buy isnt..

First you said the Lancer is mass produced and now you tell me you agree the Skyline is too...so what is your point again.

But u count the number of lancers that go past on a busy street compared to the number of GTRs or even GTSt skylines. :)

And we are talking australia here, it is skylines australia :)

You just keep counting your Lancers and I will keep counting the Skylines...again what is your point. You can even count GT-Rs and I will count how many Evos there are.

My against for the EVO is simply the fact it looks too similar to a normal lancer, which in no way is a performance car anyway.

So u cant say the GTR is just a riced up gtst. The entire range of skylines is performance bred, but lancers;  

One side is cheap cars to be mass produced, the other peformance.

And brand new they are fairly expensive.  

I wonder who told you the Lancer was a performance car, did the little ricer lancer boy tell you that and you believed him. Why would a normal car need to cost that much if it was the 4G93 GSR then you'll find they are in a similar price markup. What's interesting is how you find every Skyline is performance bred...seriously I wonder where you get your information! Because of the GT-R or because they also come with a Turbo engine...alot of cars come with different engines doesn't make them performance bred.

The GT-R and the Evo are completely different to their family model line up. Both were purposely built for competition. I'd even say the difference is greater between the Evo and Lancers today then the GT-R and Skylines.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
×
×
  • Create New...