Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What a maggot!

Formula 1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone says the easiest way to bring down grand prix ticket prices is for teams to accept less commercial rights income.

Bahahahaha!

That is all.

Too soon. I mean he looks to have some talent but shouldn't they put him in something a bit quicker for a year or two? Like a Sauber?

Pressure must be on Team Cheater Abu Dhabi if Kimi is to lead them next year based on this years results.

You would think Grosjean would still be half a chance at either McLaren or TCAD.

I hope something happens somewhere that gives Romain a shot at McLaren or Fezz. Still stick by my statements that Alonso will see out Fezz and Vettel a chance to sign for McLaren for 2016 season with Romain keeping his seat warm for 2015....which will effectively bne a drive off between Romain and Magnussen to see who will partner Vettel in 2016.

As delusional as Maldanado this bloke.

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/9487921/JEV-I-showed-my-potential

Scrappiest of races with penalities, running off the road left right and centre...yet is claiming it as his arrival drive. Where did he qualify again? :) Hack. Off you go to Nissan LMP1 program and leave Romain to fly the F1 flag

Brabham crowd funding appears to be working.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/project-brabham

Wonder if it would actually be interesting?

Brabham-Engineer

Brabham-Engineer will involve the community in the development of the team’s racing technology while providing online training on what it takes to reach the pinnacle of motorsport engineering. Project challenges will cover all aspects of aerodynamics, CFD, suspension geometry and gearboxes, where members can get involved in the development of specific parts or even a future Brabham prototype, with certification of their achievements.

We are also in advanced talks with a market-leading CAD software developer to integrate their technology into our web application. You will be able to see your designs come to life as you contribute towards the development of Brabham Racing.

Brabham-Engineer is more than just an e-learning platform. The race team brings everything alive, putting context to our content and a providing a practical experience that’s unlike anything else in the market.

Edited by djr81

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I see what you mean on that last paragraph and makes sense. I am leaning towards because I made the repair/filler area large that I didn't use a long enough block. Will minimise the area and let you's know how I go. This is random but I noticed when I put epoxy primer it felt flat but that's just temporary.
    • Tried to repair with filler only. The block is a foam block but quite hard and I put a velcro on it for sandpaper, the hook and loop system. It's not one of those super soft ones that just follow the panel. Similar to a dura block.
    • You need one of those automated sprays that puffs a nice small every 15 minutes in their room. Except swap the nice smell for chloroform...
    • Don't step down power supply size, maintain it the whole way. It's how I'd do it. OR, Id have one feed, with one joint that splits out to six smaller gauge wires that go to each coil. I wouldn't add joins like stepping from 12 to 16, at the first two coils, as if you try to continue that fashion, each joint will introduce a voltage drop. In theory, earths should be the same size as power feeds, however in this case the main power needs to be bigger due to the average size current. So the next question is, how much current do these coils actually need?
    • I think Murray is onto it. It's sounding like either it's a soft block, not long enough block, OR if you're chasing waves, you're going in the direction of the waves, instead of across them. Rotate your sanding pattern by 45 degrees is something to try. You said you're going in an X, so now instead, from the same perspective, do a "t" instead.   If you're not able to have the block sit on top of two high points, and not touch the low point between them, you'll never get it flat.
×
×
  • Create New...