Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys had a bit of a search but couldn't find my answer.

ive installed a plazmaman throttle body and plenum

I hooked a compressor up to my intake to pressure test the system whilst doing so found that it was leaking around my tps.

I removed it and sure enough there was a fair amount of air coming out from the end of the throttle shaft seal. it starts to leak at about 14psi and gets worse up to 22psi where I stopped as that's around where itll be getting tuned at.

just want to check if this is normal.

I called plazmaman and they told me that its completely normal and it wont be noticed also that I shouldn't have been doing this as its a static pressure 20psi and so on.

any input from experience would be much appreciated

It shouldn't do that. I can accept that no seal is perfect and that there might be a small leak, but if it is a lot of air, then that it wrong. Having said that, what you think is a lot of air and what I think is a lot of air are likely to be quite different.

In addition, kick the Plazmaman phone person in the snatch for being stupid. There is no difference between being put under 20psi internal pressure on a purely static basis and having the air flow past. Knobheads!

lol well it does seem like quite a bit of air to me but who knows, I guess when it goes in for a tune up ill see what unigroup think.. I didn't think there should be a difference with the static vs dynamic thing but didn't want to seem like a knob head arguing the point if I was wrong

haha I gave the fitting I used to hook up the compressor back to its owner.. on my hand it felt like the amount you would expect to come out of a 1 or 2mm id hose at that pressure.. not the most accurate guess but a worrying amount to me, even with the tps on you can feel it blowing out on your hands.. my hands are all that sensitive either, no cheek up against it needed

I would make sure there are zero leaks before taking it to them. In fact you want zero mechanical issues when you arrive there so they can smoke it and get on with tuning unhindered.

Time is money and it only ends up frustrating for both them and you.

I realize this wolverine but how am I to determine if this is an issue when the manufacturer is saying its normal and not to be worried about.. without getting a second opinion from someone who knows what there talking about such as yavus or mark at unigroup

it was alex I spoke to, he was quite helpful through the original purchase stages.

How would I have it proven to leak for them when they dissaprove of a static pressure test.. btw just to check before this goes further, the regulator on the compressor was showing quite a higher pressure but my assumption is that it was leaking out the valves as both my boost gauges in the car where what I took the readings off..

Yeah might do, I would prefer to have a definite that it's an issue first before complaining getting a new one and finding its the same.. i I called yavus he said it is normal and more common in aftermarket tb's as long as it's not excessive.. I have a feeling this may be excessive though

Yavus is going to tune so if he is happy with it then you should be sweet.

I have had cars back and forth from tuners over the years due to minor niggling issues and I was always lumped with the bill so I am a big fan of taking a week or so extra to get the car 100% mechanically right before tuning.

Yeah I would definitely like to have it 100% but I don't have any other way of having it tested, unless you have suggestions..

The car was being tuned and with a couple of other small faults, he said there was a loud hiss with high boost so I'm trying to find it, it was originally thought to bbe around the intake runners but with the compressor and some soapy water I think I've eliminated that, I found that I accidentally put the check valve in the wrong way for my carbon canister solenoid so I fixed that which was making noise with a bit of pressure from the compressor. I'm hoping that was it if not it must be this tb. I don't think I have another option other than back to the tuner

They already did smoke test it, couldn't find it as the smoke test only goes to 5psi and it doesn't pop it's head until beyond that, not sure if me testing it cold allowed it to not show itself I figured cold would be better as nothing would have expanded..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...