Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I know this has been posted a million times but I was just wondering if anyone has written a succinct how to guide for the brake cut off mod on the m35? Can only find 100 page discussions and no actual how to.

Any help would be greatly appreciated and sorry about the noob-ness.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/436771-brake-cut-off-mod-how-to-guide/
Share on other sites

All info you need is here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/397960-m35-stagea-brake-cut-off-mod/page-1, but read all the way thru to get all the tips.

There's no fully detailed DIY 'how to' as such, mainly because it's really easy.

Find wire on ECU.

Cut wire.

Run to switch or some other 12V source to allow ECU to 'reset' CEL.

Edited by Commsman

Don't worry about running it to a 12V source. I have had to replace an ecu which blew from fiddling around with 12V to pin 55.

Just cut the wire and put a switch over the cut. Run it to wherever you need to mount the switch.

Don't worry about running it to a 12V source. I have had to replace an ecu which blew from fiddling around with 12V to pin 55.

Just cut the wire and put a switch over the cut. Run it to wherever you need to mount the switch.

Sounds like someone did something wrong then. 12V is 12V. How does the ECU know if you've got your foot on the brake or the wire is connected to the reverse lights (for example)?

Then again its a wagon. Not a gtr

True, but why does anyone do mods at all? This is about the easiest mod & best bang-for-buck of any available for a M35 imo. Even if you never drag it ('cause it's a wagon, not a GTR :)), being able to give it more than 30% throttle immediately after you've braked for a corner is worth the few minutes spent doing it.

Edited by Commsman

did it take you long to do the mod?

Not really. The wires going into the ecu don't have much play so it was fiddly , but other then that it's prob a 30 min jon by the time you pull the kick panels off etc.

[quote name="Commsman" post="7154590" timestamp="1388140065"

True, but why does anyone do mods at all? This is about the easiest mod & best bang-for-buck of any available for a M35 imo. Even if you never drag it ('cause it's a wagon, not a GTR :)), being able to give it more than 30% throttle immediately after you've braked for a corner is worth the few minutes spent doing it.

My reason for not doing is 'Not' because its a wagon, its that im color blind and cant figure out what wire to cut....

Pin 55, not hard to find mate, you don't need the color... Just makes it easier.

Perhaps you can get someone color capable to tell you if you have the correct wire? :P

ECU_PINOUTS 13_12_10.PDF

Not really. The wires going into the ecu don't have much play so it was fiddly , but other then that it's prob a 30 min jon by the time you pull the kick panels off etc.

did you have to connect to 12v power josh? eg cigaret socket

did you have to connect to 12v power josh? eg cigaret socket

No just throw a switch across the cut wire. Then when the car throws the code. Just flick the switch on and hit the brakes a few times

did you have to connect to 12v power josh? eg cigaret socket

the main 12v power source used is the reverse light circuit which can be found in boots top panel where compliance putsvthe baby seat holding points. All you will need is a test light to find the wire once the reverse gear is selected. Hope that makes sence

the main 12v power source used is the reverse light circuit which can be found in boots top panel where compliance putsvthe baby seat holding points. All you will need is a test light to find the wire once the reverse gear is selected. Hope that makes sence

would you do this on the ecu wirring for reverse?

No just throw a switch across the cut wire. Then when the car throws the code. Just flick the switch on and hit the brakes a few times

This. ^^

As there are many other people who are going to read this, just crimp some spade terminals onto the wires and run it to a switch, that way you can easily reset the code every month or two.

Leon seems to think everyone is an electronics guru, but there is absolutely no need to automate such a simple signal. All the ecu needs is a 5 second burst of power which is easily automated but I have seen so many wiring faults caused by DIY brake cut fiddling after owners reading threads like this... Now I just recommend the simple wire cut. (unless you feel very confident).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...