Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lets say i have an r33 gtst, front mount and an airbox on

engineering cirt for the holes cut and its all legal, cops stop me, no dramas

lets say i change to a front facing plenum, that makes a no no 2 intake mods.

is there any way i can have this legal?

obviously with all the emissions plugged in?
is it not possible or will it require another engineering cirt?
i live in Victoria and aware the laws may be different per state.
thanks for the advice in advace
Rich

My understanding in VIC is 1 intake mod only, whether it be a aftermarket cooler, pods or whatever.

You shouldnt need a engineers certificate for intake mods from my understanding unless you were making holes that may effect the structural integrity of the car.

Most coppers dont know what they are looking at when you open the hood anyway, they are just looing for things that stand out with brand names and shiny or anodized.

Paint your front mount black, say its factory and tell them your front plenum is the only mod (and hope for the best)

Edited by GTRPSI

dont get me wrong, i could reem off pleanty of ways to evade. neo engine cover etc rb26 markings so police think its a standard intake etc

and i know you can get away with it for years.

but the question is there a legal way? at all?

when i got the holes cut for the cooler and got it engineered it was a load off my mind because i knew that 99.9% of police were off my case unless i was doing something stupid.

i can spin it when it comes between paperwork and cars but i want to know if there is any legal way what so ever to have this mod done.

It is a fairly blanket law, I don't think there is a way around it, the police will simply defect it anyway.

What are you hoping to achieve with the ffp? I have seen 430kw flow fine through the stock one...

It is a fairly blanket law, I don't think there is a way around it, the police will simply defect it anyway.

What are you hoping to achieve with the ffp? I have seen 430kw flow fine through the stock one...

scotty, im quite sure they will. and afraid it will always be that way.

in the past ive always been intelligible and nice enough to explain to the police that my car is legal and have the paperwork to back it up.

is there any strict engineering regulations that absolutly prohibit me from driving a car with those specs.

Can it be tested again and a cirtificate drawn out that it can be legal that way? hell, im willing to pay the $700 for it! What about hot rods. some of the things done to them is obscene and police seem to leave them alone although i acknowledge theres an obvious difference between the two.

i know what im proposing is not wise but is it possible??

Can you engineer an RB26 into it? That might get around the ffp bit anyway...

Return flow coolers are good for 430+, and I can fit 2.5 inch down past the radiator for cross flow setups. No need for cutting holes in the chassis unless you are planning 450+kw these days. How much did the cert cost you? All the bureaucrats have done is help us prove the stock gear flows more than enough. :P

scotty, i appreciate your replys, and i know the stock stuff flows well. i knew a guy who did a full port match vlt intake and exhaust including hiflow turbo with stock vlt gear in a r31 and made 260+ rwkw wolf3d + injectors on a standard throttle body!

but im not in the market to buy or flow standard gear as i already have the greddy plenum fitted and running. i f**ked the motor replacing the bottom end bearings as they were the wrong size so i bought a new motor, the greddy plenum fitted.

i need to know from someone with solid expierence around getting engineering cirtificates if its possible at all.

None of us can help then, you need to talk to an engineer willing to accept responsibility, and then it will need to pass an expensive emissions test, (which it will most likely fail) and as you have a programmable ecu the EPA will never pass. (unless you go straight LPG)

Engineers / VASS = Mechanical only. Not detailed emissions.

EPA = Detailed emissions.

Plenum comes under emissions. Put simply, you won't get that legal. You have to undergo full ADR testing in Vic as that's how it is. That'll cost you more than the car is worth.

Hot Rods are not a good example as they are pre EPA laws, plus they are cool, Police tend to leave them alone.

Also if the VASS signed off on any cooler holes in a Airbag equipped car and they are chassis cut, you will still get Police sending you for another engineers as they should not have signed off on that one and Police know that, again, if chassis was cut only.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
    • Bit of a similar question, apprently with epoxy primer you can just sand the panel to 240 grit then apply it and put body filler on top. So does that basically mean you almost never have to go to bare metal for simple dents?
    • Good to hear. Hopefully you're happy enough not to notice when driving and just enjoy yourself.
    • I mean, most of us just love cars. Doesnt necessarily have to be a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...