Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok this is a flight of fancy more than anything else but does anyone know of a successful dual clutch gearbox transplant into a Skyline? It would be a major undertaking with a lot of custom work (read: cost prohibitive) but would be very interesting to see nonetheless.

I had a quick look at eBay and you can get some second hand Porsche PDK units from around $5k in the US. Used DSG boxes from VW seem to start at around $3k - not that those would take 300rwkw without some serious work.

But yeah 200ms shift times would be sweet :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437774-dual-clutch-gearbox-into-a-skyline/
Share on other sites

This will eventually have to get to the aftermarket (ie, some sort of semi-universal programmable control system for 2nd hand DSGs). But I don't think it is here yet.

But, there are very very few DSG type gearboxen that you would consider taking on board after someone else has used it. There is no way on God's green earth that I would ever own a VAG DSG out of warranty (in fact, I wouldn't buy any VW or Audi type vehicle at all, let alone a DSG one). Most other manufacturers dual clutchers have shocking histories of random and expensive failures. The only ones that would be desirable, from the lack of sudden death viewpoint, would probably stay expensive.

It would be good to see, but I think it would be hard to get an adapter or custom bellhousing made to bolt to the RB block. I'm not sure how the gearbox splits the input to the 2 shafts, so might be a bit busy in the front of the gearbox. I'm sure its doable, but you might have trouble with boxes that are rear mounted and get drive from the engine through a prop shaft.

WIthout having ever seen one out of a car, sitting there available to have a bit of a look at, its hard to say. Would probably end up costing a bit if you were the first to try it, but if an adapter or modification to an existing box was mass produced it might bring the price down to something which would make people think twice

As above, I would be a bit sketchy about using a VW dual clutch. My girlfriends VW Polo is on its second DSG after a re-call and it shudders in 2nd on a slow takeoff which I think was half the reason they were recalled (not sure if it was the cause of that girl whose dsg failed on a motorway and was killed, but the shudder is a common problem)

Maybe the Nissan GT-R box would be good but it wouldnt be cheap and has the prop shaft input.

Edited by 89CAL

It would be good to see, but I think it would be hard to get an adapter or custom bellhousing made to bolt to the RB block. I'm not sure how the gearbox splits the input to the 2 shafts, so might be a bit busy in the front of the gearbox. I'm sure its doable, but you might have trouble with boxes that are rear mounted and get drive from the engine through a prop shaft.

WIthout having ever seen one out of a car, sitting there available to have a bit of a look at, its hard to say. Would probably end up costing a bit if you were the first to try it, but if an adapter or modification to an existing box was mass produced it might bring the price down to something which would make people think twice

As above, I would be a bit sketchy about using a VW dual clutch. My girlfriends VW Polo is on its second DSG after a re-call and it shudders in 2nd on a slow takeoff which I think was half the reason they were recalled (not sure if it was the cause of that girl whose dsg failed on a motorway and was killed, but the shudder is a common problem)

Maybe the Nissan GT-R box would be good but it wouldnt be cheap and has the prop shaft input.

I remember watching a doco on the GTR, and they said stress test every DSG box that they fit on a car on a special machine to make sure it works perfectly, on top of the strangest handbuild production methods. They stated they are the only manufacture in the world to do so. The only ones I have heard of breaking are the early model ones that were incorrectly "launch" controlled, and new ones that have to put up with over 1000hp of abusive driving. Aside from that, I have never heard of one ever breaking on a unmodified car.

Though how would you even get it to work with the RB? The design is completely different from every perceptive.

Thanks for your input everyone. It pretty much confirms what I thought - would be neat but way to exxy to be feasible at the moment.

I think there's some hope though, if you look at the dual clutch gearbox supplier list on Wikipedia there's heaps in production. No doubt in a few years there will be more to choose from. There's something in the idea of mating a 15-20 year old RB to the latest in gearbox tech :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...