Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure, but why would you bother?

Best thing to do is rip off all the plenum parts, and the lower runners, and clean the whole lot thoroughly as there will be a LOT of built up carbon down the runners. You will need to make a scraper to clean the head ports out. Doing this will give you all your top end back. You will go through a lot of carb cleaner so buy a box... You might want some oven cleaner/gasket stripper to help remove the built up gunk.

Deleting the vac operated swirl valve before the head might increase power a little at the expense of a little cruise economy.

Deleting EGR would help keep the lot clean so you don't have to do all this work again, again at the expense of cruise economy.

Main reason is just to squeeze a bit more power out of the engine. I know i should have gone for the 350GT if i wanted power but can't argue with the price i got my 250 for. Already have a z tube and a K&N drop in. Will try giving the inside of the plenum a clean, but any idea if the 350GT spacers would work?

They don't give power gains from my experience, and modding the engine without first maintaining it properly is a little backwards imo. You will gain more power changing to a synthetic oil than the spacer can ever give.

Stick the stock air panel back in firstly, or at least a cotton element as you have already taken a backwards step. You might want to clean your AFM element too, now you have most probably sprayed a fine mist of K+N oil onto the hotwire...

Ztube does absolutely nothing, other than make the intake louder. It is just a bit of pipe, were you expecting gains from it?

Done. Replaced with a standard one from Ryco. Got some new oil for it as well, full synthetic. The current oil is looking pretty minging.

No not at all, and if there were any they'd be so minimal i wouldn't feel it. A lot of other people have reported close to 5-8% gains with a spacer, so i was just curious.

Some have done dyno runs to show the benefits of the space on the 3.5L engine, so there are some gains there, not sure if that would translate into any gains on the 2.5L DD engine though.

the Z tube is absolutely just for sounds though.. after all the 350Z produces the same power/torque as the 3.5L engine in the V35.

Here is the direct injection intake assembly that creates swirl in the chamber, it essentially shuts off one intake valve at high vacuum. (idle/cruise) You can see how cleaning or preferably removal of this assembly would benefit power production. It's the first thing I would be doing if I had a dd in service. Followed by a turbo. :P

post-63525-0-37557600-1390309100_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-67603000-1390309115_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...