Jump to content
SAU Community

Stock Exhaust Manifold? When To Change?


Badgaz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Howdi everyone,

i've been thinking ALOT about where to next with my skyline. my modification list is as follows

PowerFC

z32 maf

850cc injectors

GTR Fuel pump

Evo 3 intercooler (stock piping positions)

greddy type rs bov

factory exhaust manifold

hi-flowed factory turbo.

i've been following and looking at the posts regarding the GT3076R turbo and noticed this turbo can fit with the factory manifold. my end power goal is a reliable 450-500hp

what is possible with a turbo like this and keeping the stock exhaust manifold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's upwards of 340rwkW and is therefore still within the ability of the stock manifold to flow, but getting well up toward the top of what works. So you'd do well to look into die grinding the runner ports a little to open them up, but particularly at the outer ends where they don't tend to line up with the head ports as well. Clean them up to get better alignment basically. Maybe a little tickle into the collector.

The best thing you could do though would be to look at the Hypergear thread and see what he has done (somewhere in the last 10 pages) to a stock manifold. Makes it able to support a hell of a lot of power by fixing it so the wastegate flow doesn't have to go through the collector into the turbo housing. (Obviously for mounting an external gate on it). It's not a trivial mod, but almost anyone half handy should be able to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats good information to know.... i think i'm probably being a tad optimistic for that power figure given that my donk has done 300,000kms now....perhaps 300rwkw is more realistic. will mosey on over to the hypergear thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its fine...i've just changed the oil...it drinks probably half a litre between oil changes? i put 5 litres in and about 4.5 litres come out. i've just tidied up the tune so hopefully its a little better now...was running 9 afrs @ wot prior to tune for a good 50-70 thousand kms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had a 6boost twin scroll and a stock manifold with a GT/GTX3076 setups on same tune and was running around 320-340kw, both felt the same on the street which was unexpected, the 6boost has larger and longer runners and collector which in comparison to a stock

manifold might effect things negatively on a street car?? just my opinion

Edited by AngryRB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's upwards of 340rwkW and is therefore still within the ability of the stock manifold to flow, but getting well up toward the top of what works. So you'd do well to look into die grinding the runner ports a little to open them up, but particularly at the outer ends where they don't tend to line up with the head ports as well. Clean them up to get better alignment basically. Maybe a little tickle into the collector.

The best thing you could do though would be to look at the Hypergear thread and see what he has done (somewhere in the last 10 pages) to a stock manifold. Makes it able to support a hell of a lot of power by fixing it so the wastegate flow doesn't have to go through the collector into the turbo housing. (Obviously for mounting an external gate on it). It's not a trivial mod, but almost anyone half handy should be able to do it.

Yeah when i did my manifold studs and gasket last i took to it with the die grinder and took all the casting marks off and tried to port match the end manifold ports a little better...its quite the lip isn't it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

300-350 is usually considered about the safe area for stock manifold that sees some hard duty... I'm sure you can always push 400 through it but question is, do you really want to...they are already prone to warping and cracking. Of course if it's only a street car that does the occasional skid, its not really going to be an issue though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a big enough turbo you should see 450wkw through the stock manifold, but it will become a restriction at much less. You should be fine with 340kw on the right setup.

Obviously the better flow from a good aftermarket manifold helps with the top end, but larger runner manifolds also take longer to build pressure, causing the turbo to be slightly less responsive down low. They are also illegal so I only like changing to them on track cars, otherwise there is a good chance you will get defected the minute the bonnet is popped.

its quite the lip isn't it!

Just remember, the manifold grows considerably in length as the exhaust temp rises. I imagine the ports would line up fairly well when the manifold is cherry red, as it could be around 10mm longer than it was. The water cooled alloy head wouldn't expand anywhere near as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The manifold is clamped to the head. I would tend to think that the thermal expansion turns up as stress in the cast iron rather than much actual dimensional change. Otherwise the fasteners will be sliding across the flange surface and the flange will be sliding across the gasket and everything should turn to poo within a few hours of operation (ie fall apart and start leaking).

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The manifold is clamped to the head. I would tend to think that the thermal expansion turns up as stress in the cast iron rather than much actual dimensional change. Otherwise the fasteners will be sliding across the flange surface and the flange will be sliding across the gasket and everything should turn to poo within a few hours of operation (ie fall apart and start leaking).

That is exactly what happens, and why you need large thick washers under the nuts. I wonder why the manifold studs are always snapping...

Clamp the manifold down to tight and it will transfer the stress into the manifold, good chance it will crack not long after, unless the stud lets go first. I would be torquing them down to manufacturers specs with oem gaskets, I am sure Nissan did a fair amount of r+d on the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those thick washers are conical in shape to allow for the expansion.....i've snapped 4 studs before and had to drill out a snapped easyout on cylinder 6....always use the factory washers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do conical washers allow for expansion along the plane of the flange?

Conical washers are a SPRING washer. They allow for expansion along the axis of the bolt/stud so that they don't get loose through heat cycling.

The thermal expansion along the plane of the flange is the reason that studs end up breaking. They get worked from side to side.

I'm surprised I have to explain this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...