Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As for steering geometry the effect of spacers is exactly the same as getting the "right" offset with no spacers.

The correct offset is more than having the wheels flush. Its about where a line drawn through the center of the tyre would intersect with a lne drawn though the centre of the ball joints. Moving the tyre inboard or outboard without using the correct offset moves that intercection point further apart ot closer together, further changing the scrub radius. Using a spacer will not correct the incorrect offset UNLESS it brings the incorrect offset being used closer to the original scrub radius.

The pulling affect is called bump steer.

would the scrub radius be pacified by adjusting the camber angle ?

not necessarily the standard camber setting !! , but a re-calculated angle to account for the offset change / or indeed lowering of the vehicle - different size tyres are said to contribute to the scrub effect .

I now run 25mm spacers on the front of my RSV4 S1 ET43 8.5" - and it was the best thing i did so far .....

Cured my horrible understeer .. and improved the look

I have adjustable suspension all round and I am low , BUT running standard caster / camber / toe in/out measurements .

However on uneven roads it dose tend to wander off .

So now i am wondering If another angle for the caster , other than standard , is worth a try ( $130 bucks a shot in UK !! ) this i would think may also include toe angle ? and may help with the original questions issue

Well i spent hours taking the spacers off yesterday as the previous owner must have used locktite to put the nuts on.

Drove it this morning with no spacers and it still pulled when on uneven roads, spoken to the located mechanic and he is going to ave a look next week, i need new tyres anyway so gonna get new tryes and a wheel alignment saturday and go from there, eveeryhitng under the car seems ok, but im not a mechanic so im not 100% sure, i have new sway bar links and sway bar and sway bar rubbers but bushings etc at 150k old so could be anything. least i know its not the spcaers, and i can put them back on and try a few other things i guess

The correct offset is more than having the wheels flush. Its about where a line drawn through the center of the tyre would intersect with a lne drawn though the centre of the ball joints. Moving the tyre inboard or outboard without using the correct offset moves that intercection point further apart ot closer together, further changing the scrub radius. Using a spacer will not correct the incorrect offset UNLESS it brings the incorrect offset being used closer to the original scrub radius.

The amount of offset is irrelevant. The act of moving the wheel (and tyre) out from the original, stock position changes the geometry and while it may be done mainly for appearance it also has the effect of increasing the track. Whether this is achieved by wheels with a different offset or with spacers the result is exactly the same. In my experience this change has no bad effect on steering or handling. In Ted's case he reports an improvement in that he has reduced understeer.

would the scrub radius be pacified by adjusting the camber angle ?

I have adjustable suspension all round and I am low , BUT running standard caster / camber / toe in/out measurements .

However on uneven roads it dose tend to wander off .

So now i am wondering If another angle for the caster , other than standard , is worth a try ( $130 bucks a shot in UK !! ) this i would think may also include toe angle ? and may help with the original questions issue

Yes a little negative camber (1 to 1.5 deg for the street or rather more... 3 deg for the track) will help. More castor (6 -7 deg ) will help with straight line stability particularly at speed. You will need adjustable castor arms to achieve the latter but you can achieve a small increase in negative camber with adjustable bushes. In either case you will then have to correct toe-in.

  • Like 1

So i was lucky enough to get my mechanic to ahve a look at my car today, Jon from Driven Motorsport in SA is amazing and knows his stuff and highly reccomend them to anyone in SA.

As i said in previous post spacers, didnt seem to be the issue.

Mechanic did a full check front and back, seems that previous owner cut the rear springs so rear is very soft, the rear sub frame bushes in the rear, are fine, but not the best and have a bit of movement, and could do with replacing.

so after getting new tyres this week will see how it goes =)

Well I have had our Stagea for 6 years now and bought the car with Tein suspension , Rays Volts 18x8 + 32 with 235x40`s , 25mm spacers all around , 1 1/4 degrees camber front and back , lowered 40mm as well and have no issues . However it depends on many variables and in the end , who sets up the suspension.

Edited by coparts41

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...