Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fear not QLD cuz reinforcement is here.

ONE IN A ROW ??? Think I should get some of the admins to change it to ONCE EVERY EIGHT YEARS!

There was some bad calls that could have changed this game in favour of QLD very fast.

NSW got this one but only just - and that was on there home turf.

QLD I thought was better team........................wait wait wait - it is a better team :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315943
Share on other sites

  On 19/06/2014 at 1:44 AM, r32-25t said:

Just like Queensland then, so both teams got away with it, so it can't be bias if they were both doing it

You are right in saying both teams did it. You are wrong in saying both got away with it. One team was penalised twice as often. So yeah it can be biased. And I am not actually claiming bias. I am claiming shit refereeing and this time QLD was the one that suffered. Next time QLD could benefit and I would still be pissed off. At this level refs should not be deciding games
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315953
Share on other sites

I agree this ref should have been dropped after the first game.

But there were some calls that could have seen nsw score earlier as well but we will never know

No sam dropped it, ive seen a tigers try taken away under very similar circumstances

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315958
Share on other sites

Sam's try wasn't in my opinion. Correct ruling.

Not a good end result on the Scoreboard :/

celebrate your win Blue's. Congratulations :cheers:

Honestly, If it was me I'd still be disappointed in some of your teams performance.

Gallon, Bird, Farrer, Watmough and even Hayne were a disappoint.

Gallon, Farrer and Bird hogged the ball too much trying to be the HERO and win the game in a team sport. The score would have been so much more in your favour if not for them.

I didn't even know Hayne was on the field till he ran 40 meters (over his dead ball line). 10 seconds left and the blues still in fear of a loss, says a lot in itself.

Call me one eyed but a better team lost on the night.

A slap, Pffft. A headbutt, Pffft - really? Soft much ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315960
Share on other sites

Why is it NSW won yet my fb news feed is full of NSW supporters complaining that the crying will begin from QLD supporters, and there has been maybe 1 or 2 QLD supporters even post :glare:

No wonder I don't follow the game, I wouldn't know if I am meant to have a cry or not win or loose!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315962
Share on other sites

  On 19/06/2014 at 2:02 AM, Sinista32 said:

Sam's try wasn't in my opinion. Correct ruling.

Not a good end result on the Scoreboard :/

celebrate your win Blue's. Congratulations :cheers:

Honestly, If it was me I'd still be disappointed in some of your teams performance.

Gallon, Bird, Farrer, Watmough and even Hayne were a disappoint.

Gallon, Farrer and Bird hogged the ball too much trying to be the HERO and win the game in a team sport. The score would have been so much more in your favour if not for them.

I didn't even know Hayne was on the field till he ran 40 meters (over his dead ball line). 10 seconds left and the blues still in fear of a loss, says a lot in itself.

Call me one eyed but a better team lost on the night.

A slap, Pffft. A headbutt, Pffft - really? Soft much ?

that slap was the best - good ol Thurston made laugh

Intense game it was - that's why I like state of origin

The passion each team have makes it all worth watching

The refs - shhhhhivers they will look at some footage and go 'yeah I f**ked that call up' lol

Bring on next game but more importantly next years Origin series

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444612-one-in-a-row/#findComment-7315972
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...