Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, ive just built a 25/30 and im having a few issues with it.

ill list the parts as to give you the most info i can

Bog stock rb30 block (didnt shave it)
sump breather

Head: r33 s2 VCT ( re seated valves did valve stem seals, shaved to get it dead straight.)
MSLR 1.3mm head gasket

Z32 afm
z32 nistune

Oil cooler
660cc Jecs injectors
DW300 300l/h fuel pump
KKR 660x turbo
NZ steampipe mani
45mm hyper gate
standard cooling system ( HR31 skyline)

So to get this thing going im running it n/a ( wanna make sure nothing is wrong with it before i cram boost into it)
It has an rb25de tune with adjustments made for z32 and 660cc injectors.
AFrs are around 14-15 on idle and 12-11 on WOT

The car gets warm real quick, but water temp never exceeds 90 deg
the issue im having is that the turbo and mani are getting real hot after a casual drive ( havent had a thermometer on it but its radiates heat asif youve been hammering it for awhile)
The turbo leaks oil out the front housing ( which i assume the heat has killed the seals?)
a crack has also formed on the exhaust housing ( coudlve been there before but im unsure.)

the cooling system is also pressurising a hell of alot even though the temp is at 85deg (shown by nistune) im assuming the coolant is boiling in the turbo creating the pressure in the system.

Turbo has more than avg shaft play aswell as the oil that leaks out the front of it.
Oh and with the rad cap off if you give the engine a rev the water will rise up and out of the rad.. but not bubble. and no oil is in the water. Oil is clean
so my question is WTF IS GOING ON?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445223-2530-build-few-strange-issues/
Share on other sites

What?

How is it running na?

Where is the afm?

The radiator cap off rev situation seems normal.

Did you have the turbo just free spinning? That would probably have over sped it.

Edited by Ben C34

just have piping running to the afm as youd see it on an n/a setup

turbo was free spinning for the first while of driving, but the gate now has the springs removed and it is open. didnt change the sound of the turbo much at higher RPM.

i wouldnt of thought that n/a would of produced enough gas to over spin the turbo.
the previous car this was on (rb25) it hit full boost at 4400 or something, hell of alot more gas when there is compressed air added to the equation.

Spinning against no resistance means it would have spun heaps fast. All of the exhaust would have gone through the turbine as the wastegate wouldn't have opened.

I suspect it caused the damage.

I wouldn't have done it. I hope it's not too bad.

It would have overspun to no end. But there would be almost zero load on the shaft and bearings anyway. That's not an area that people are knowledgeable in so you may or may not have f**ked the turbo. Hard to say

it was 2nd hand anyway and has a crack in the rear housing, oil in the front housing and a fair whack of shaft play. Why are you considering using this turbo? buy a freshie if you want it to run properly and reliably; who knows, this one could spit the comp wheel into your intake and lunch the motor too.

forget about the water rising in the radiator with a rev, that's normal. Pressure in the cooling system is also normal, to an extent.

In terms of moving forward with your project, I think you should set it up how you intend to run it (ie turbo). Install all your proper intake piping, cooler and AFM piping then just tune it. You've got a good base project just needs a bit of tweaking.... that's if your turbo is okay, personally I wouldn't use it but you may be more inclined to do so

Edited by Blackkers
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...