Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Your explanation of the PCV is making sense to me; however in this scenario, wouldn't the PCV still be closed even though the crankcase is under positive pressure: -

It depends on how much negative pressure the Venturi system is creating and how much positive pressure is in the intake, as soon as there is boost in the intake the PCV closes and the gases are meant to go to the I take of the turbo

[\quote] I'm driving hard on boost - Positive pressure in crank case causing the PCV, negative pressure from the venturi in the pipe leading to the valve. In this scenario, I would expect the valve to be shut but shouldn't it be open to vent the crank case so that the blow by isn't just venting out of the catch tank - it obviously has no where else to go does it?

That's right, the positive crankcase pressure should be getting sucked out by the Venturi since the is boost pressure in the I take manifold it can not go in there as the boost pressure will cause the PVC to close

[\quote]So, I then take my foot off the gas and theoretically I should be in a vacuum/negative but the crankcase won't have vented because it has no where to go so. I then have very little suction (well a little bit), from the venturi port and still positive pressure which means the port is still closed...

This is when the PVC will open and draws gases away from the cam covers pulling gas out of the crank case, the PVC is controlled by the intake manifold unless the Venturi system is creating a higher vacuum level

[\quote]

This is what I don't understand

This is the PCV valve that the venturi port connects to:

rb26dett_pcv_valve_1.JPG

Now, I see that in some race car setups, they actually have a vacuum pump; even in this scenario, isn't the PCV still always just closed?

The Venturi connects to the exhaust side cam cover, the PCV connects to the intake side cam cover and the two covers are connected to each other but both have the volume of cam covers and head and well crank case to draw from effectively separating them from each other

The crank case should never be in negative pressure with out external help as even at idle there is blowby just not much

The vacuum pumps that race cars have is because they are using stupidly long duration cams and have lost the intake vacuum in doing so so they have to create it somehow, which should not be connected through the PCV as it would just cause it to close

Okay right, so I have custom intake and exhaust cams on this car! (TODA 264 9.3mm).

Currently with the operation of the PCV valve though, if the positive pressure inside the crankcase is higher, the valve remains shut? because that's currently what happens if I simulate the effect by blowing on the side with the screw

The PCV screws in to the balance tube on the intake manifold so the threaded end is seeing what ever the intake manifold is doing

So vacuum created by shutting the throttle bodies opens the valve and when the throttle bodies are open and boost is going into the intake manifold it closes the valve :thumbsup:

264s are not stupidly long duration, 280+ is getting stupidly long :(

Who does your tuning and what ECU have you got ?

Hey,

So, this is where the PCV is connected to; straight off the end of the black pipe that comes from the intake cam breather. I thought that's the valve cover not the intake manifold.

EyQU6DZ.jpg

I have an Apexi Power FC ECU; I do a lot of the tuning myself and with the original owner but I'm ok with the tuning aspect; I built my own det cans and have the AFRs at 11.5 on boost with 12 coming on to boost. I run idle at around 13.9 as the cams don't take idling at 14.7. The ignition timing is a bit more convoluted to explain but that should be good too. The CAS is set by the original owner and I haven't touched that and the boost controller is a greddy protecB that I manage the boost with.

We use venturies on our mining equipment to vac out the dust collectors on the air filter box's, but the actual venturi pipe is located just inside the tip of the exhaust, so as the gas expands out it creates a negative at the end of the vac pipe,

It took quite a bit of trial and error to find the perfect distance from the tip, but it wont inside the exhaust near the turbo with that much pipe left!

  • Like 1

Lol! yeah quite correct... it did work kinda but if your oil air seperator isn't up to the task you just draw through oil vapour and make a nice smokey exhaust. i still have one connected....but my issue was not ventilating enough i.e venting through a size smaller than the two 5/8 vents off the cam covers effectively pressurizing my catch can.

Xgtrx, no, positive pressure from the exhaust never reaches the PCV because of the one way valve. My original post shows the valve that stops any exhaust gases travelling back up.

If exhaust gases were getting up, they would actually open the PCV valve which is what I don't really understand and I the opposite case of what I've been asking about

Yeah but if both valves are closed when the car is on boost, where is the positive crankcase pressure going, the only way out is through the dipstick, yes? It can't be scavenged through the exhaust because the exhaust gasses would causing positive pressure compared to the crankcase. Or have I got this totally wrong?

That is correct except for the reasoning behind why the gases aren't being sucked out. They aren't being sucked out because any suction closes the PCV valve, which surely can't be right?? and I believe that's why oil is going out the dipstickbut I can't understand why someone clever enough to build an engine and set up all the timings etc would fit a Venturi to a valve that never releases any positive pressure from the crankcase. It seems to me like if a Venturi is being used, then a PCV valve is not the correct valve to use.

I am not advocating for or against the use of Venturi to create negative pressure, nor am I saying I will keep this solution, but if this setup, in theory, were supposed to work, how would having a PCV valve connected do anything if it only opens on positive pressure from the exhaust side, for which there never will be any because of the one way valve not allowing any exhaust gases through. The tube that connects to the PCV in this setup is always under vacuum. The Venturi is creating good suction at idle and even more as the rpm increases which implies to me that all PCV valve will never be open.

Your thinking to big picture and in this case that's not how to do it

What you have is two differential valves, one is controlled by the intake manifold and the other is controlled by the exhaust pipe and while in theory this should work the practical side of mean both valves shut at the same time

The intake one closes as soon as the throttle opens, when the throttle is open the exhaust gas increases to the point there is backpressure which closes the exhaust side one

now this is where you need to read carefully, while there is more pressure on the outside of the valves then the inside they remain closed so the crankcase is building pressure from blowby which is lower then the intake pressure and exhaust back pressure it has nowhere to go except out the dip stick tube

What you need to find out is what the Venturi is doing at full noise when the exhaust back pressure is at its highest and the motor has full boost level

  • Like 1

Xklaba, starting to understand I think.. Although I can't imagine that much back pressure. It is 4" all the way through to a tiny back box and doesn't have any cats.

Maybe I'm still a little confused but am I wrong in thinking that the gases should be escaping through the PCV valve?

No exhaust is going to have zero back pressure no matter how fee flowing it is. The exhaust is being pushed into the exhaust pipe.

I have to disagree with that, an old mate of mine had an exhaust that was 3" dia and 4" in lenght with seperate screamer pipe on his turbo R1 :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...