Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as some of u know my car was stolin and strip of her engine cooler and ecu leaving me with not much at all well well well the *** wits where cought trying to sell off my gear over the net and in the trading post my freinds told me about it so i checked it out told the police about it and they arange for me and a copper to go and have alook as this stuff as we where keen byers ha ha ha ha when we met this person we asked him what dose have he said hear have a look as we did and boom :D i saw it there my front mount cooler nismo my ecu motec and my poor baby rb26 been pulled down to little bits :) just wanted to kill him then the copper pulled out his bage and busted the wanker as we found out there were 4 of them who go around and target performence cars and pull them up on tow truck and strip them and dump the bodie well KARMA people u just got to belive in it thats for sure whats goes around comes around they lived on spring vale road spring vale and they where lebs not to say all people are bad or anything just stateing who they where ? well im glad and thought goes out to any one please be carefull whee u park your car i might be very lucky hear as it is very very hard to get your things back in this case im just have good mates who look out for me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44839-the-fools-where-found/
Share on other sites

It is such a relief to know someone out there has had a win with car thief's , does not happen very often . Hope the coppa's up here have as much luck , as there has been a sh!t load of cars stolen up here of late.

did they find the $4,000 VSPEC II NISMO EDITION Engine  that you sold ? but you said its yours now! weird. caught in a lie.

your so funny man, your full of crap.

EDIT : i thought they tought English in Yr-7 ? i geuss 2 years of it isnt enuf...youll get stuck in VCE dont worry.

Did they try to offload it on ebay too? their accounts should be banned by now considering now that they're arrested, you may want to notify ebay if you haven't...

Glad to hear you recovered the bits and arrested the scums... can you put everything back into the car to make it all sweet again?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...