Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Revs make no difference in flow tests, it just changes how quick the tube fills.

The opening (lag) times are critical for idle and obviously flow at 100% duty is important at the pressure you plan to run the fuel at.

For the cost of cleaning and replacing the filter/Orings you should probably have looked at new EV14's.

My car idles perfectly fine,

I also only use 64% duty

The question is. one cylinder 5.1 percent leaner = melted piston?

Or.. 5 cylinders over compensating to get 14.7 afrs= loss of power.

In a nut shell.

Should I recon

Buy new

Or leav them be.

It lives it's life on the limiter aswell

Have they been cleaned or just flow tested? Typically you would clean first then flow test. Some ECUs let you tweak individual injectors to compensate for variation. If you're running an rb26, put the highest flowing injector in #6 as the stock plenum tends to feed more air to that one. Nismo plenum fixes that issue.

Just gonna bin them. And get new bosch and top feed rail. I'll search first but I'm just gonna throw it out there real quick,

Where do I get the cheapest set and rail to suit greddy manifold. Any particular size or model I have to get to fit?

Lastly, anyone want my denso 550 in rail?

150 bux.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...