Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451492-hks-gt2530-variants/
Share on other sites

all share the same CHRA/wheels except the kai.

Housings differed like mentioned.

RB26 housings also differed mainly on exh side, early had no splitter late had a splitter on the outlet that was flush to the outlet flange. Apart from that some minor gate differences

No real power difference if your using a 1-1.5'' wastegate separator in a bellmouth

They should all be using the same cartridge and wheels 446179-21 from memory . I seem to remember the KAI version having a port shrouded compressor housing so was likely a single turbo version . The main unique part today is the 60mm 63T compressor wheel and I think it was only ever used in 2530s and one other app I can't remember .

You can turn any GT2860 with the same turbine into a 2530 if you have the original undamaged compressor wheel and housing . Swap the wheel in balance and bingo new guts .

A .

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

I'm gathering parts for a turbo upgrade. I'll be looking for roughly a safe 320rwkw but more power down the track so I'd like to get the right turbos from now, hence why I'm looking at the 2530's. I know -7's or even -9's would be better suited to that 300+ mark but any more power later on will be maxing them out. So I guess at the moment I'm just trying to educate myself on my options.

Just get the -9s.

Sell the -9s if you ever decide to go for 400rwkw and get 2530s in 2/3/4 years (or more) and enjoy the -9s for their application for now because realistically 2530s is motor out/rebuild time anyway. So changing turbos isn't a big expense.

  • Like 1

Might also depend on your demographic, i.e Sydney lots of 40/50klm zones and not much

in the way of over 80klm higher load gears, a few hundred rpm of boost threshold and

less off boost power can make driving around on bigger turbos tedious.

The opposite if you live in an area with lots of open roads or highways. I.e rural or

the US. You can get away with larger turbos since you are mostly above 80klms with

very little time spent in stop start traffic and low speed pot holed filled corners,

stupid 40klm school zones with not a single kid in sight. In this case you can go

for the -5 or 2530's and just not spend enough time off the boil to care.

End of the day, it still comes down to drivability first as the main consideration

on size, then peak power goals.

I will tell you my experience. I had a unopened motor with -5's and they were a little laggy (running 345kw atw) but on the open road they are great. In the city not to much (as above).

When I rebuilt the motor and did head work now pushing 400kw the -5's have come alive. Still running 2.6L and they are more than fun anywhere haha. I wouldn't waste money getting 2 different sets of turbos (selling one for a loss later) if you plan to rebuild. Go for a set you want to keep deal with the lag at first then benefit later when you rebuild. Less cost when you do rebuild.

Also as Jeremy Clarkson said - lag can be fun at the lights when people think they are winning then they wonder where you have gone.

Yeah I do see where you're coming from but would the -9s be that much better than the 2530s for my goal that you can justify doing it twice?

Absolutely. Turbos are the most important thing to choose. They decide everything in a set-up in a stock-ish scenario.
You are talking about $1,200 or so. So like I said if you plan on not rebuilding etc for 2 years or more - then change it out when the time comes.
I've had both -9, -5s and modified -9s... The -5s around town, hill runs, motorkhana etc as stated, are tedious on a 2.6l. -9s win for a car doing that type of work hands down.
-5s come into their own above 120km/h-150km/h+. You just gotta ask yourself how much time are you spending above that? And go from there.

Would HKS GT-SS's be an even better option?
Thanks for all the help guys

Much more research needed. The Garrett -9s and HKS GT-SS are the same turbo, just a different branding. HKS "kit" just comes with everything you need to bolt on, oh and a much higher price tag.

For my project the motor will be just one aspect in a sort of complete rebuild with suspension next and ultimately paint and interior so I think what ever set up I go for now will pretty much be it for a while (providing the motor doesn't give up). Having said that though I do miss the punch my 33 GTST used to give so maybe that little bit of lag given by the -5 will be enjoyable but I definitely don't want to have to go 120km+ whilst ringing it's nuts for the turbos to show what they've got. My best bet would be to experience most, if not all of my options first hand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...