Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys ..

few weeks ago i asked for some help and got some good response from some ppl here. just wanted to show you guys my results..

so the set up is rather simple..

fuel :am using a aermotive stealth pump with some dw800cc injectors

ignition: stock

engine: arp head bolts , wiseco piston stock compression,extended sump and harden oil pump gears and stock everything else..

extra: am also using a aem water injection kit..actually just using filtered rain water to aid our crappy 91 ron fuel ...

management : haltech plug and play

tuned by me :)

15 psi :336trq & 414whp

21 psi :409trq & 499whp

from the dyno graph i thought this would been lagy ..but i was so wrong ....car pulls and spools just as good as my old precision 6262 bb .makes more power at same boost. at 11 psi with the old 6262 i was making around 340hp & with the 8375 11psi car made around 370hp both without water injection

honestly very impressed for a turbo i paid 580us for compared to the 6262 which cost 1200us..

and all of this was done with a single scroll 8375 and a ebay single scroll $140us manifold..... may be i got lucky with manifold but its just as strong as the one i paid 400us for before.have put countless abuse on it and no cracks yet.

dyno graph and vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfhW7fvX-Bg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452309-rb26-borgwarner-8375/
Share on other sites

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

post-47556-0-70740500-1420352595_thumb.jpg

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

yep they do spool super fast for journal bearing turbos..... i was really worried when i first compared it to a physical size of a 6262 .

as you can see in the vid the moto sits in a s15 silvia which is super light ...the weight difference of a r33 at 3400lbs and the s15 2700lbs makes this car feels like its almost at 650hp...

with some cams and cam gears i should be able to get power in a tad quicker and make a higher peak hp...

looking forward to seeing your updated build results...

yep... but the results with the 6262 would not be applicable to compare because it was done with out water injection ..so the timing when tuning was alot different .but the 6262 did make 415whp at 20 psi where as the 8375 made 499hp at the same boost... but the 6262 was only running on a .63 housing which would make high hp numbers on such a big moto difficult .

i had read some where a guy changed out his .82 ar 6262 for a .63 and the results were minimal difference on his rb26..but i cant confirm that........i know on a 2.0 honda moto moving from .63 to .82 makes no difference ..

only results i have with both turbo is at 11psi without water spraying either ways and the 8375 did make more power then....

Ok thanks mate, would be good to see some more results on this turbo going around.. This night spark a bit more interest

Here is my thread on my results if you are interested

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/414766-gtr-joeys-r32-gtr-e-flex-twinscroll-8375-results/

hey.. i used a .88ar back end because i was worried about lag as the turbo was non bb..

your dyno graph is a lil unfair comparison as the bigger ar back ends has 5psi difference .it may not look like much but once these turbo begin to spool the move from 7psi to 21psi in a heart beat... that may contribute to more power lower in the power band..

the twin scroll will help with spool up when combined with a twin manifold..

what moto are these graph from?

  • 9 months later...

Here is my graph on a 6262 by with .84 TS setup and 93 octane gas

611 at 19 psi

550 at 15 psi

I think if I had 9:1 Cr pistons my torque would've been a lot higher

I'm using JE 8:3:1 CR pistons and Tomei 264 cams.

EC990DBB-75E3-4453-89C1-EC9B0C5E4339_zps

Edited by silvianc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maf is a question mark but TPS  I have set at 0.47, the fact that I’m getting proper voltage range out of it with the key on leads me to believe it’s functioning properly. I’m getting proper voltages on basically everything. I still need to look up voltage ranges for z32 maf and test that 
    • Honestly no not at all, but it’s a very basic tune, it’s stock injectors q45 tps and z32 maf. Other than that it’s a completely stock base map. The file is from nistune and from my understanding if it was tune related I would be able to unplug maf and tps and it would still start even if it was a really shitty start. I have tried starting it with coolant temp, maf, and tps unplugged none of those 3 togethor or individually changes anything 
    • 🏆 Skyline Supremacy Meets Mount Panorama Magic 🏆 Join SAU NSW as we take the long way to Bathurst, the home of GTR greatness. Saturday 30th August 2025 7:00AM Meeting Hanna Park North Richmond 7:30AM Departure Cruise Via Bells of Line Road 9:00AM Arrival to Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat 9:45AM Arrival to Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit Meet Location: Hanna Park North Richmond Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit   *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day   Highway gets as low as 10l/100km on my end so I'm not as worried about it being a mechanical issue. More likely just the tune on the haltech.
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
×
×
  • Create New...