Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just rebuilt a 25/30 with bearings and rings ( no oversize, all stock parts)

im just wondering what the best method is for runnign the motor in, ive read that starting with higher rpm cycles, letting it cool and then doing lower rpm cycles is the reccomended method.
The hastings box was kinda vague with " accel from 30mph to 55mph"

I was hoping some guys on here with real time exp could help out.

Cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452984-running-in-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Minimal idling to start with and as much load as you can (without being too silly) is crucial, I've had some engines that are bedded in within 10 mins of running/revving and others take some driving, guess it comes down to bore finish, rings, oil etc.

First start is very crucial, once you're satisfied with oil pressure bring the revs up, 2000rpm idle is fine (and necessary with new cams), keep water topped up and gradually give it some revs as it comes up to temp, if you think you have air in the cooling system shut it off before it boils.

Once you're on the road drive it normally for a street car, not abusive but use all of the rev range and as much load (boost) as you can depending on tune.

And always use mineral oil until its bedded in (good compression/no blowby).

That's all I can think of at the moment :)

Edited by DanielH

Provided that your oil is up to it, there's no harm in running an engine like this in HARD, if its gonna be abused it may aswell do it from day 1, some people may disagree with that though, but the only items to "run in" are rings and cams/lifters, and rings bed in by high load/pressure forcing the rings out, cams are straight forward, if using old cams no need to worry!

You need some load to bed in the rings, start light loads, keep the revs to under half of redline at the start, decelerate to pull the metal off the walls after accelerating, gradually building power as you go along progressivly, drop the oil after 10-15 minutes and repeat the load cycles.

Dont baby it, dont wring its neck at the start, drive it normally with load on it, its the load that forces the rings against the walls to bed them in, its the decel that pulls the crap off the walls.

Also remember that fresh walls are the roughest, the most heat and wear happens in the first few minutes so you dont want too much load for th first few minutes as it will create a lot of heat due to friction.

Cheers guys this helps a lot, I'm using purpose run in oil that penrite sells, how many ks should I do before I take it back to the dyno?

And I suppose once it gains compression across all cyls is when you tell its bed in.

Reads 150 across all 6... Apart from cyl 3 which reads zero. But after a leakdown test the exhaust valves arnt sealing ( lifters arefresh so no oil in them yet either)

150 is pretty good already if it hasnt been run/or run much.

I'd go easy with the Penrite running in oil as I find its pretty thin when its hot, it's great stuff but I wouldn't give the motor too hard a time with it in there, that's just my preference though.

My preference would be running in oil for initial start up, and then maybe 500-1000 K's or so of fairly sensible driving after the first service, then I would switch to a high performance mineral and take it to get tuned and then go to whatever oil you plan to run it on.

No, each cool down on the dyno is about 15 minutes. You do a few pulls with decent (not massive, just decent) load and revs, then allow the dyno fan to cool the engine back down.

You should only need <10 dyno pulls like that, separated by cool downs to bed the rings. Similar number of pulls on the road.

One of the main things to avoid is to spend much time at constant and light loads for the first hour or more of running it. You really need to give the engine constantly varying load and speeds between light and moderately heavy/fast. This is far more important before the rings have bedded, but still important even after those first few run ups.

  • 2 weeks later...

Right so ive attempted runnign the motor in,
FIrst drive - 2nd/ 3rd gear going from 2k to 5-6K rpm, letting it decel all the way to 2 k again. did that 10 times roughly then let it cool.
same again with the second drive ~~

Comp tested it as soon as i had it back in the garage and got 140 across all 1-5. battery died at 6 and only showed 120~ but thats understandable.
will comp test again when the engine is cold.

Now that its had about 15-20 min of driving with that penrite run in oil, should i drop it and put some mineral oil in and do abit more driving like above?

Drop the oil certainly. But you could consider doing a 1000 kays on another batch of run in oil. The main thing with run in oil is not so much that it's mineral rather than synth. It's more so that it contains a lot of detergents and whatnot for helping to clean up the crumbs and blobs of foreign material generated by assembly and the running in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...