Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I'm having an issue with my silver top RB20 intermittently not starting properly. If I turn the car on and it's dead cold it starts but if I turn it off straight away and try to start it again it sometimes wont start or even sound like it's close to starting. For it to start again it needs to left for several hours it seems.

The car has been sitting for the last 6 months however prior to that I've had no trouble with it starting in my 5 years of ownership.

At one point when it wasn't starting it ran out of fuel I think (dodgy fuel gauge) as the pump started making a loud noise. I've since filled it up so the fuel in it should all be fresh.

I also had an issue with the car running badly above 2000 rpm and swapped to a new AFM however this hasn't changed the starting issue at all.

If anyone has any suggestions that would be great as I'm at a real loss at what to do :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453454-rb20det-starting-issues/
Share on other sites

When this happens, try and unplug your water temp sensor on the coolant neck. It's the 2x wire one that goes to the ECU, see if that helps or unplug the AFM

It could be when your car is warm/warmer the cranking enrichment isn't enough to get the motor going.. it could be a mixture of things, dirty/faulty AFM, faulty FPR, dirty injectors, etc.

Changed the spark plugs today, while the car seems to run smoother now it didn't change the starting issue :(

I tired unplugging the wire on the coolant neck while it wasn't starting but that didn't make a difference.

I should mention that I've been turning the car on for max 30 seconds before turning it off and trying to start it so I don't think the problem is really heat related. That said if you leave it for a few hours and come back it will start first time.

How would a go about testing the fuel pump? And could that cause an issue with just start up?

Changed the spark plugs today, while the car seems to run smoother now it didn't change the starting issue :(

I tired unplugging the wire on the coolant neck while it wasn't starting but that didn't make a difference.

I should mention that I've been turning the car on for max 30 seconds before turning it off and trying to start it so I don't think the problem is really heat related. That said if you leave it for a few hours and come back it will start first time.

How would a go about testing the fuel pump? And could that cause an issue with just start up?

did you disconnect the coolant sensor for the ECU or the one for the dash? the ECU one has 2-wires not 1...

(not sure how related this is to you but here goes)

do you have access to a wideband o2?

back in the days when I knew nothing about cars (10+ yrs ago).. I had the same issue with my RB20DET, a mate that was doing engineering at uni suggested I hooked up his wideband. Ended up finding out the car was running lean in general when it was in vacuum, turned out my injectors were all clogged.

As soon as got all the injectors serviced, new o-rings put in the car started easily and idle was back to stoich.

Humour me a little and just try a mates battery

Don't use a jump pack or try jump it off another car

Connect direct to terminals

Ps. Every time you try to start it and it doesn't start your plugs get a bit dirtier and eventually fouled again.

Edited by Sinista32

Just tried a battery out of a car that gets driven every day, had slightly higher cca as well. Result was still the same though.

While it wasn't starting I also took the line off the fuel filter and primed the car and tons of fuel came out. I don't know know if that tells me if the pump is working fine though.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
×
×
  • Create New...