Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

What do you mean sneaky?

I ran a hooker aero chamber and a Berkeley straight through at the rear. Was under the legal vole by a fair bit, no drone and flowed over 300 rwkw.

Research exhaust design. Two mufflers the same don't do much more than one. Fit the biggest mufflers you can fit. Look at branch resonators if you have a particular frequency drone you want to cancel.

I tried a few combos until I was happy with the result.

That exhaust system in the pics looks identical to what I have, but mines 3 1/2inch and a 3inch large oval Xforce muffler on back and is perfect, sounds quiet enough and on boost nice...

the muffler I have snakes inside the muffler and works great.

heres a brief clip, pretty quiet, got loose in first 3 gears lol

Edited by AngryRB
  • 2 weeks later...

I can supply either a 3" or 3.5" muffler / resonator combo without any stepdowns that have max flow and a deep , quieter sound. AES is the name. If you want to go quieter check out active kits at www.activeexhaustsystems.com.au

Fujitsumo twin 2.5" is reasonably quiet. Not that you can buy it new anymore. Because it is twin 2.5" it has good ground clearance.

I've had one on the car 7 years and police pull me over probably 10 times in that period, at least. Only comment I have had from them on exhaust is that it sounds "reasonable".

Edited by simpletool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...