Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No. The "H" in R200H stands for helical. Those are a rare beast.

Standard viscous LSD Skyline diff is R200V. Doesn't matter, because the CW&P set from one type of centre bolt onto others readily enough. Example. I have 4.11 gears from an R33/4 viscous diff bolted onto helical centre from an S15, all stuffed into R32 GTSt housing.

also doing some thinking.... can i just take the 4.11 ring and pinion out of the GTT rear end and fit it to the R34 GT-R rear end??? reason for not wanting to use my r34 GTT rear end is the spider gears are welded and the inner half shafts are 5x1 pattern and wont fit to my 6x1 axles in the R34 GT-R rear end

There are one or two small errors in that diff table. All GTRs (non active diff ones anyway) prior to the R34 were conventional mechanical LSD. I haven't paid enough attention to R34 GTRs to learn whether that helical entry in the Nismo table is accurate or not. I suggest an extensive google search for you to try to find out.

As I said in my above post - CW&P sets can be moved freely between R200 centres. I'm sure that there are likely to be one or two cases where that won't work.

Be aware that if your diff centre is in fact helical then they use different half shafts to the other R200s though. Different length on one side. So no easy swappsies there.

But, and here's the thing......you do not have a GTR rear end anyway, right? It's Stagea. Right? So no discussion about helical or GTR diffness is of any value. Right?

There are one or two small errors in that diff table. All GTRs (non active diff ones anyway) prior to the R34 were conventional mechanical LSD. I haven't paid enough attention to R34 GTRs to learn whether that helical entry in the Nismo table is accurate or not. I suggest an extensive google search for you to try to find out.

As I said in my above post - CW&P sets can be moved freely between R200 centres. I'm sure that there are likely to be one or two cases where that won't work.

Be aware that if your diff centre is in fact helical then they use different half shafts to the other R200s though. Different length on one side. So no easy swappsies there.

But, and here's the thing......you do not have a GTR rear end anyway, right? It's Stagea. Right? So no discussion about helical or GTR diffness is of any value. Right?

here is the Rear ends i have....

R34 GT-R (3.454)

Stagea (4.083)

R34 GT-T (4.111)

the motor and trans I put in my GT-T are from an R32/33 GT-R. so the front diff is 4.111, and i want to stick with 4.111 due to having the 5 speed trans not the 6 speed.

I got front and rear subframes from a R34 GT-R (this is where i got the R34 GT-R rear end and this is why i need to swap the gear ratio)

I cant directly run the R34 GT-T rear end due to it having 5x1 bolt rear axles

I cant run the Stagea rear end at all due to 3x2 bolt axles, 30 spline shafts instead of 32, and 4.083 ratio. -this rear end is basically useless to me

I cant directly run the R34 GT-R rear end due to the ratio not being what i need. however i like everything else about the rear end, its already in the brembo equipt rear sub frame, most likely has a good LSD in it, has 32 spline axles, the entire assembly is in awesome shape and has good abs/wheel speed sensors

-so i want to run the R34 GT-R rear end housing (its cleaner that the other R200 housings i have)

-I need to run the inner half shafts due to them having the proper 6x1 axle bolt ratio

-I need to run the R34 GT-R "centres" as you say due to them only accepting a 32 spline shaft which is the axles shafts that will be inserted into it

-I am need to run the 4.111 ring and pinion from my GT-T rear end to get the proper gear ratio i am looking for

I am hoping the parts above will join

If you can get the GTT CW & P to fit in the R34 GTR centre you're halfway there. Did you get any axles (half shafts) with the R34 GTR rear end? Axles of the right length may be your next challenge. And making sure all the wheel speed sensors are compatible. Are you trying to replicate the whole Atesssa set up with ECU, central sensor etc or are you copying the English model of just using a stand alone controller (as in another thread here)?

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...