Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I run a 232 234 112 cam and it certainly isn't a pig. And it doesn't need 5000 to come alive. Compared to stock the power and torque started climbing substantially from 2500 rpm. Perhaps the Ines you experienced were shit tunes.

Not for a split second would I want a smaller can. Auto its a different story.

I drove an M6 LS1 with a 224/230 Howards cam and 3.9 diff, it felt like a doughy dog until about 4500. The owner agreed when he drove mine. Like I said, I've seen plenty with the 232/234 that were disappointments around the street.

Less is more IMO with street driven LS cam selection.

Willall are one of the most reputable tuning places in the country, graph looks pretty good, here's mine. Not tuned by RAS, but on their dyno. Disregard first plot, it's not accurate.

347a5tu.jpg

Cheers for posting your graoh. It would be interesting to see your mates graph.

Luckily being in SA Willall is the obvious choice. The car runs so nice.

Will be taking to the drags soon, just want to sort the diff out first.

Really glad I never sold my RB, these graphs are quite disappointing when you think of almost 6L's of V8 and theres only 200ish kw's at 4000rpm plus the torque, my skyline would be frying tyres whilst overtaking the LS1, I guess they arnt high tech but still bit shitty, I'm keen on a VCM9 though in the future mostly for sound, the RB is really where the fun is though I think, missing mine..

be interested to see what your LS1's sound like compared to mine.. any vids to share??? I could upload one of mine for comparisons..

Edited by AngryRB

mine doesn't even bake first... hahaha, one step at a time hey.. with a manual one day it might lay a black line in second.. then that's worth throwing a party..

Haha

Hey greg, in this one, https://youtu.be/s80O-2-zrvM whats the noise in the first few seconds? sounds like lifters but then you push thru it like F#$k this shit lol , and that's cheating that's a 300zx :laugh:

Edited by AngryRB

Hey greg, in this one, https://youtu.be/s80O-2-zrvM whats the noise in the first few seconds? sounds like lifters but then you push thru it like F#$k this shit lol , and that's cheating that's a 300zx :laugh:

No idea what the noise is - probably just the video mic or the dyno whinging!!!

The driver complained that when he pulled 4th gear doing 160 - 180km/h at the track, if he put his foot down, it smoked the 300mm wide slicks!!!

Since then we freshened up the engine, softened the suspension, and did some brake work, so it will be pretty quick at the track.

There are lots of LSX powered street registered cars with far more power than the Z :woot:

Off topic I know but since JC/SC are run by f**kwits brainwashed by tuners who's looking for quick buck.

Tell me, what's the point in having bigger throttle body on stock manifold?

Off topic I know but since JC/SC are run by f**kwits brainwashed by tuners who's looking for quick buck.

Tell me, what's the point in having bigger throttle body on stock manifold?

Looks cooler.

I asked Willall about it and they said don't bother.

Mate of mine is building an LS1 for his S14 at the moment and decided to have a look at the stock throttle body and manifold last night and saw there is no point going a bigger throttle body as the inlet manifold mouth will be smaller.

You don't really need to touch that stuff unless you're aiming for 350-400kw+.

Another mate runs one of those big tunnel ram looking Edelbrock manifolds with a big throttle body and still only makes about 320kw but fark me it sings.

Off topic I know but since JC/SC are run by f**kwits brainwashed by tuners who's looking for quick buck.

Tell me, what's the point in having bigger throttle body on stock manifold?

You'd be thinking of JC where idiots drink the MACE / Oztrack kool aid.

Most LS owners know that stock headed LS1 is not really good for more than 280rwkw or so without head changes or FI.

No one really bothers with TB upgrades on LS1s these days, Holley / FAST intakes are of most benefit for LS2 owners (due to shit factory intake manifold) or big cam / strokers.

Mine is on the lower end for that combination of cam + engine - either way it will roast the first 3 gears if I want it to (full rpm shift into 4th is @ around 120-130+ km/h), and IMO has 'enough' power for street driving, in a car that weighs about the same as an R33. Lazy gearing is the letdown, and probably why the dyno sheet looks doughy <4000rpm. Trust me when I say it's not like that to drive.

I miss my R32, but I don't miss the RB25 compared to having a Gen 4 LS.

Also there is no technology deficit - the LS is fairly up to date, OHV design makes for an engine with a lower centre of gravity, more compact package, whilst still allowing for a larger swept volume.

Yeah, Greg here told us not to bother wasting $ on LS1, so I dug deeper in mine and found number of pointless mods done to it.

Now to sell them to idiots.

FYI, Ramjet is the worst designed otr of any kind, to change filters you need to break out a chainsaw and cut the car in half to get them out especially HSV and their one piece bumper/grill.

I probably wouldn't bother with LS1 these days, apart from a turbo, or s/h supercharger either. L76/77/98 are plentiful and can easily be converted to run cable throttlebodies for conversions + more compression, better fuel system and factory heads.

V6 guys are the worst - stuff like manifold insulators etc LOL.

Ramjets are terrible - the VCM OTR on mine is a bad enough design with the corners rubbing the bonnet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...