Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi i got a r34 gtt and my cars is having issues starting were itll start after 3-5 sec after turning the key and it has a rough idle like as it has cams in it.

This weekend im going to do a service on it were ill also do the plugs and fuel filter and clean the AAC valve, but i believe i got a bad o2 sensor.

The car has a tune on it i got the typical high mount with a gt3582 with the gate going straight to atmosphere and got a plazemaman plenum. I haven't had this issue till recently were its started to run rough and take a while to start. But when i checked my power fc i noticed that once the car was warmed up and after a drive the o2 sensor reading was at 0.02v and when i reved it to about 3000rpm it would only go up to 0.04v.

Ive got a photo of my data reading from the power fc, but does anyone know what else could cause my issues as i got no vacuum leaks or anything, but i am pretty certain it is the o2 sensor it self, as i dont believe it has been disabled. I was planning on just replacing the o2 sensor with just a genuine nissan o2 sensor.

Thanks,
Nick

post-66618-0-67947800-1428505757_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455537-o2-sensor-issue/
Share on other sites

The stock o2 sensor is a narrowband sensor. This means it reads a narrow range, cant remember off the top of my head the exact figure. When the car is idling (which it is in your photo) then the o2 sensor is pretty much reading nothing, it is outside its designed operating range. The o2 sensor only really does anything at cruise. With the Power FC you can turn it off in your settings/etc menu (from memory), its o2 feedback you want to change. FWIW I had mine disabled permanently and tuned the car to the cruise AFR's I wanted

It will not be the cause of your starting issues. The o2 sensor does nothing during startup. If you don't believe me, turn o2 feedback off and you will see no difference.

The problem is probably with the tune of the car. Without a wideband o2 sensor and gauge, its not so easy to diagnose, and by the sounds of it you would be better off taking it back to your tuner if you are not happy with the way it starts. Most tuners will happily fix starting issues for free, however if its a cold start problem it is a bit harder becasue the car has to be cold before they can look at it, which means if you drive it to the tuner it has to sit there for a while

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455537-o2-sensor-issue/#findComment-7512559
Share on other sites

Hi guys id like to update, the o2 sensor is working fine i didnt check it properly at the time, however i believe after looking at my car i must have a vaccum leak somewhere as the car mainly idles rough,but will stall when i turn the ac on, it drives fine around and you know you can trash it but i think it might be under boosting as when i set it 20psi on the power fc it only boosts to 15psi.

However im not too concerned about it not boosting to enough pressure i am more interested in why its running rough and it stalling when the ac comes on. Ive noticed on the fuel pressure regulator it running at 28psi and under load about 36psi, i read somewhere that the fuel pressure is usually around 34psi im not to sure if its not been set. I did have a while ago a fuel smell and some hoses on the plenum side had to be changed im wondering maybe ive got a loose or broken hose on that side, thats causing the issue. Also possibly im thinking i might have a fuel sock blocked or fuel filter.

Could someone tell me what could be the causes off a rough idle that will smooth out when reved but it will stall on idle once the ac is turned on. Note that the car also has no bov but has been tuned without a bov, dont know if this could cause issues.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455537-o2-sensor-issue/#findComment-7518497
Share on other sites

The tune is poor at idle. There are settings in the Power FC to iron out some issues with the A/C on

Go to where your rev limit is and there are settings there for A/C. From memory there will be F/C (fuel cut) with A/C on and off (half of its in Japanese so can't remember which is which) and also Idle with A/C on and off.

Havent played with a Power FC for a little while but you can up your idle with the A/C on a bit and do the same with the fuel cut (which means it will disable fuel cut at whatever RPM you set). Playing with these may help your idle, and you can't really stuff anything up playing with these so I would play around with them first, you will just have to work out which is which.

If you struggle to get any kind of change in idle or the figures are maxed out, then the IACV may be wound in or out too far. You can adjust this and then try messing with the idle again.

Other than that you can use map tracer to see which cells the tune are jumping to when the AC is switched on and off. But without a wideband it is harder to work out what is happening.

Honestly, if it was me, I'd take it back to the tuner and say I wasn't happy with the idle and get him to fix it (should be done free of charge)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455537-o2-sensor-issue/#findComment-7518704
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...