Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The problem HarrisRacing seems to have is that state and federal legality are two different things...

But beyond that, and since this topic falls under multiple federal agencies, is that not all of them have to agree (and typically don't, just look at the twenty one year exemption for EPA vs. the twenty five year exemption for NHTSA). If ONE of those federal agencies disagrees with something, it's done. The NHTSA says it either has to conform or be over twenty five years old to be eligible for "exempt" status. This vehicle is neither. The GSA might say it's legal, but the NHTSA doesn't.

Government agencies don't work well together, contrary to what you might believe. That's the point I think Matvei is trying to make here. One agency saying it's legal doesn't mean it is *completely* legal.

Exactly. But since EPA and NHTSA make the most important rules of all, the state laws tend not to be such a big deal (except for California, but even then you can get it registered as long as you pay for their test procedure).

In the US, Customs/DHS controls entry.

#1 Customs/DHS

Under them, the NHTSA handles safety standards. They require a HS7 to be filled out.

#1a - NHTSA - HS7

Alongside them, we have the EPA that handles emissions

#1b EPA - 3520-1

When a car enters the country you need some kind of ownership document

#1c Ownership doc

You also need an invoice to show value so you can pay tariff

#1d - Invoice

So unless a vehicle came in though Customs/DHS, NHTSA cleared it, EPA cleared it, there is some kind of title, and you paid tariff, it was not done correctly.

A seized car, that was seized due to non-compliance is required to be exported or destroyed. Now never saying those people don't make mistakes. I have seen it many times.

State title, we see it all the time.

There are 100 ways to do things illegally, to bypass the law, but there is ONE way to do it right.

Its like saying I did drugs in my house last week and no one caught me. I am fine. I see people all the time ignorantly spouting off about what they have, what they "got away" with.

In the US, Customs/DHS controls entry.

#1 Customs/DHS

Under them, the NHTSA handles safety standards. They require a HS7 to be filled out. And listed in which states: vehicles manufactured 25 years (or greater) prior to the date of importation are not required to follow any NHTSA or FMVSS rules In order to be allowed to enter the country.

#1a - NHTSA - HS7

Alongside them, we have the EPA that handles emissions. Similar as above except only YEAR of manufacturer is the comparing variable and the checkbox that applies deals with vehicles manufactured 21 years or later from YEAR of manufacture are excluded from following current EPA rules.

#1b EPA - 3520-1

When a car enters the country you need some kind of ownership document.

#1c Ownership doc

You also need an invoice to show value so you can pay tariff

#1d - Invoice

So unless a vehicle came in though Customs/DHS, NHTSA cleared it, EPA cleared it, there is some kind of title, and you paid tariff, it was not IMPORTED correctly.

A seized car, that was seized due to non-compliance is required to be exported or destroyed [and likely should NOT have received an (sf)97 which throws a total unknown into my car's history]. Now never saying those people don't make mistakes. I have seen it many times.

State title, we see it all the time.

There are 100 ways to do things illegally, to bypass the law, but there is ONE way to do it right.

Its like saying I did drugs in my house last week and no one caught me. I am fine. I see people all the time ignorantly spouting off about what they have, what they "got away" with.

To me, more like saying: Someone smuggled in cuban cigars that were then seized by the government, someone in the government then rebranded them (accidentally) for sale as US cigars, then a cigar shop bought those at auction and then sold them as US cigars and now after a long time the US-Cuban embargo has lifted and now Cuban cigars ARE legal for purchase in the US.

So let me ask is ANYONE still tasked with looking for Cuban cigars or cares that back in the day the cigar imporation process was skirted?

How in the world do you think they would possibly find cars that WERE black market cars amongst all the cars being imported now?

Eventually those HS-7's and 1320-1's will be lost in transfer. And it's CLEAR from the EPA and NHTSA websites that they do NOT have the ability to track clearance with VIN numbers, so really...how would they even accomplish such a task?

What do you think about my comments? Not trying to be funny, but rather trying to reasonable.

As much as you guys would like to paint the government as this unreasonable door-kicking-in guns-blasting group of thugs, I'd think they have bigger border control problems than some 25 year old cars that have been here for years that they may have accidentally released to the public for sale.

NOT SAYING I WOULD ILLEGALLY IMPORT ANYTHING, just trying to be reasonable!!!

Edited by HarrisRacing

"As much as you guys would like to paint the government as this unreasonable door-kicking-in guns-blasting group of thugs, I'd think they have bigger border control problems than some 25 year old cars that have been here for years that they may have accidentally released to the public for sale."

Ever hear of Kaizo? They were door kicking in agents that picked up many of those cars. http://www.importavehicle.info/2009/10/kaizo-drama-thus-far.html

How about the recently Land Rover debacle?

Land%2BRover%2BDefender%2BCrushed.JPG

Its not if in your case, its when. You might be the one holding the hot potato.

http://www.importavehicle.info/2013/06/seized-nissan-skyline-gt-r-r33-for-sale.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2014/08/40-land-rovers-seized-in-vin-tampering.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2010/07/another-seized-car-r32-gt-r-canadian.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2011/03/state-titled-nissan-skyline-gets-seized.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2014/10/unpleasant-truths-comforting-lies.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2008/01/seized-r34-gt-rs-and-s15.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2009/12/ice-seizes-300000-cizeta-v16-kaizo.html

Did you really just post a bunch of links from an importer's website with an agenda to sell you imported cars? Really?

And...the "cases" cited regard: VIN swapping, importation illegally, reconstruction of incorrect VIN vehicles, as well as many in california which we all know importing legally past feds is only half the battle.

And Kaizo?! Already covered...a clever VIN swap game of taking cars apart and reassembling as kit cars. This is covered previously.

ALL of the cars listed were NOT over 25 years old when seized...this includes the fake VIN'd land rover.

Can you elaborate on the cfr regarding use and legalities of (sf) 97?

Edited by HarrisRacing

Kaizo was not a simple VIN swap. They were recognized as a manufacturer in most states.

Caterham and Arial do something similar but they require you to purchase the engine and drivetrain separately and install it yourself or via a third party. (which is how you have to do it if you want your imported kit car to be legal).

It's a total grey area. Against the spirit of the law but not the letter. Doesn't apply in this case anyway since your car has a drivetrain and a (albeit non-working) engine.

Edited by Matvei27

The question is how and why was the vehicle seized?

If it were seized due to non compliance, and not a street legal vehicle, then it should never have got a SF-97. Again, does it happen? Sure it does. I've seen everything done the right way, and done the wrong way.

The SF-97 is for the case of a government owned, street legal car, truck, etc that is in turn sold. It gives them the authority to "print their own title". This document can then be turned into a title.

The question again is - why was it seized? Otherwise its just a game of how long can you hide something from the government.

  • 2 weeks later...

All i learnt in this thread is that the US has an extreme amount of acronyms.....

It's just typical government red tape. Still and all, I can't complain since it's a damn sight better than the third-world country I grew up in lol. Compared to the corrupt and inefficient government back in my original homeland I'll take the US any day. Between importing myself, importing this car, and owning firearms as a hobby I've dealt with federal paperwork a bunch of times and it all works out eventually even without any "under-the-table" shenanigans lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any difference in induction noise?
    • If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...