Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The problem HarrisRacing seems to have is that state and federal legality are two different things...

But beyond that, and since this topic falls under multiple federal agencies, is that not all of them have to agree (and typically don't, just look at the twenty one year exemption for EPA vs. the twenty five year exemption for NHTSA). If ONE of those federal agencies disagrees with something, it's done. The NHTSA says it either has to conform or be over twenty five years old to be eligible for "exempt" status. This vehicle is neither. The GSA might say it's legal, but the NHTSA doesn't.

Government agencies don't work well together, contrary to what you might believe. That's the point I think Matvei is trying to make here. One agency saying it's legal doesn't mean it is *completely* legal.

Exactly. But since EPA and NHTSA make the most important rules of all, the state laws tend not to be such a big deal (except for California, but even then you can get it registered as long as you pay for their test procedure).

In the US, Customs/DHS controls entry.

#1 Customs/DHS

Under them, the NHTSA handles safety standards. They require a HS7 to be filled out.

#1a - NHTSA - HS7

Alongside them, we have the EPA that handles emissions

#1b EPA - 3520-1

When a car enters the country you need some kind of ownership document

#1c Ownership doc

You also need an invoice to show value so you can pay tariff

#1d - Invoice

So unless a vehicle came in though Customs/DHS, NHTSA cleared it, EPA cleared it, there is some kind of title, and you paid tariff, it was not done correctly.

A seized car, that was seized due to non-compliance is required to be exported or destroyed. Now never saying those people don't make mistakes. I have seen it many times.

State title, we see it all the time.

There are 100 ways to do things illegally, to bypass the law, but there is ONE way to do it right.

Its like saying I did drugs in my house last week and no one caught me. I am fine. I see people all the time ignorantly spouting off about what they have, what they "got away" with.

In the US, Customs/DHS controls entry.

#1 Customs/DHS

Under them, the NHTSA handles safety standards. They require a HS7 to be filled out. And listed in which states: vehicles manufactured 25 years (or greater) prior to the date of importation are not required to follow any NHTSA or FMVSS rules In order to be allowed to enter the country.

#1a - NHTSA - HS7

Alongside them, we have the EPA that handles emissions. Similar as above except only YEAR of manufacturer is the comparing variable and the checkbox that applies deals with vehicles manufactured 21 years or later from YEAR of manufacture are excluded from following current EPA rules.

#1b EPA - 3520-1

When a car enters the country you need some kind of ownership document.

#1c Ownership doc

You also need an invoice to show value so you can pay tariff

#1d - Invoice

So unless a vehicle came in though Customs/DHS, NHTSA cleared it, EPA cleared it, there is some kind of title, and you paid tariff, it was not IMPORTED correctly.

A seized car, that was seized due to non-compliance is required to be exported or destroyed [and likely should NOT have received an (sf)97 which throws a total unknown into my car's history]. Now never saying those people don't make mistakes. I have seen it many times.

State title, we see it all the time.

There are 100 ways to do things illegally, to bypass the law, but there is ONE way to do it right.

Its like saying I did drugs in my house last week and no one caught me. I am fine. I see people all the time ignorantly spouting off about what they have, what they "got away" with.

To me, more like saying: Someone smuggled in cuban cigars that were then seized by the government, someone in the government then rebranded them (accidentally) for sale as US cigars, then a cigar shop bought those at auction and then sold them as US cigars and now after a long time the US-Cuban embargo has lifted and now Cuban cigars ARE legal for purchase in the US.

So let me ask is ANYONE still tasked with looking for Cuban cigars or cares that back in the day the cigar imporation process was skirted?

How in the world do you think they would possibly find cars that WERE black market cars amongst all the cars being imported now?

Eventually those HS-7's and 1320-1's will be lost in transfer. And it's CLEAR from the EPA and NHTSA websites that they do NOT have the ability to track clearance with VIN numbers, so really...how would they even accomplish such a task?

What do you think about my comments? Not trying to be funny, but rather trying to reasonable.

As much as you guys would like to paint the government as this unreasonable door-kicking-in guns-blasting group of thugs, I'd think they have bigger border control problems than some 25 year old cars that have been here for years that they may have accidentally released to the public for sale.

NOT SAYING I WOULD ILLEGALLY IMPORT ANYTHING, just trying to be reasonable!!!

Edited by HarrisRacing

"As much as you guys would like to paint the government as this unreasonable door-kicking-in guns-blasting group of thugs, I'd think they have bigger border control problems than some 25 year old cars that have been here for years that they may have accidentally released to the public for sale."

Ever hear of Kaizo? They were door kicking in agents that picked up many of those cars. http://www.importavehicle.info/2009/10/kaizo-drama-thus-far.html

How about the recently Land Rover debacle?

Land%2BRover%2BDefender%2BCrushed.JPG

Its not if in your case, its when. You might be the one holding the hot potato.

http://www.importavehicle.info/2013/06/seized-nissan-skyline-gt-r-r33-for-sale.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2014/08/40-land-rovers-seized-in-vin-tampering.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2010/07/another-seized-car-r32-gt-r-canadian.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2011/03/state-titled-nissan-skyline-gets-seized.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2014/10/unpleasant-truths-comforting-lies.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2008/01/seized-r34-gt-rs-and-s15.html

http://www.importavehicle.info/2009/12/ice-seizes-300000-cizeta-v16-kaizo.html

Did you really just post a bunch of links from an importer's website with an agenda to sell you imported cars? Really?

And...the "cases" cited regard: VIN swapping, importation illegally, reconstruction of incorrect VIN vehicles, as well as many in california which we all know importing legally past feds is only half the battle.

And Kaizo?! Already covered...a clever VIN swap game of taking cars apart and reassembling as kit cars. This is covered previously.

ALL of the cars listed were NOT over 25 years old when seized...this includes the fake VIN'd land rover.

Can you elaborate on the cfr regarding use and legalities of (sf) 97?

Edited by HarrisRacing

Kaizo was not a simple VIN swap. They were recognized as a manufacturer in most states.

Caterham and Arial do something similar but they require you to purchase the engine and drivetrain separately and install it yourself or via a third party. (which is how you have to do it if you want your imported kit car to be legal).

It's a total grey area. Against the spirit of the law but not the letter. Doesn't apply in this case anyway since your car has a drivetrain and a (albeit non-working) engine.

Edited by Matvei27

The question is how and why was the vehicle seized?

If it were seized due to non compliance, and not a street legal vehicle, then it should never have got a SF-97. Again, does it happen? Sure it does. I've seen everything done the right way, and done the wrong way.

The SF-97 is for the case of a government owned, street legal car, truck, etc that is in turn sold. It gives them the authority to "print their own title". This document can then be turned into a title.

The question again is - why was it seized? Otherwise its just a game of how long can you hide something from the government.

  • 2 weeks later...

All i learnt in this thread is that the US has an extreme amount of acronyms.....

It's just typical government red tape. Still and all, I can't complain since it's a damn sight better than the third-world country I grew up in lol. Compared to the corrupt and inefficient government back in my original homeland I'll take the US any day. Between importing myself, importing this car, and owning firearms as a hobby I've dealt with federal paperwork a bunch of times and it all works out eventually even without any "under-the-table" shenanigans lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...