Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, here's the first thing you have to do. Measure the length of every single one of the arms you took out of the rear (centre of pivot to centre of pivot). THESE are the lengths that you know will work well without too much bump steer.

If you put all those adjustable arms in because you were forced to in order to fit wheels in or something, then at this point you might be screwed. But if you've just done it for fun, then you could set all your new arms to those lengths and probably find it's all better. Then you can make some small tweaks to get the camber right and hope you don't mess it up.

Otherwise, you're looking at an exercise and a half. See here. http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456906-slotting-lca-for-more-cambertrack-what-about-the-rear/?view=findpost&p=7539791

Starting with the aftermarket adjustable arms at the same centre-to-centre lengths as the OEM gear is a great start.

However if you've dropped ride height as nearly everyone does, then you need to make adjustments. The fact those replacement arms are adjustable takes the hard work out of things, and Duncan obviously needed to comply with race category regs in slotting pivot points.

With a selection of basic tools and some inexpensive to make/obtain gear it is possible to set up the rear suspension without trial/error and guess work. A piece of string, ruler, and a jack can be very useful. It will take time and patience, but you can definitely sort it so that you know exactly what toe change occurs and that you are then not experiencing bump steer if/when it's getting taily.

So, we are talking rear bump steer right? Adjusted through traction rods, which you now have?

if you have a dial indicator, making a bump-steer gauge is pretty easy, no shortage of pics for reference on google. Mine cost me about $20 in materials from Bunnings. The dial indicator is the most expensive part. I can send you some pics of mine if you need.

For reference - my car is dropped about 30mm. It was a while back now I did it but from what I recall when I adjusted for minimal steer under bump, it would then bind more under droop, so compromise was needed. The 'best' setting I found was set the rear camber to where you want first, then start with the traction rod at stock length, and then increase it by the same percentage length as I had increased the camber arm. That setting has worked fine for me and gave the best bump/droop readings so hadn't worried about it any more than that, but then again I'm not track-ing the car.

Yeah the car ride height is lowered as I have aftermarket shocks on which is where the problem has occurred. I'm really way out of my depth here and don't really know what I'm talking about. The guys who fixed up all my handling issues said the last issue they can see with it is the bump steer and said I needed to find a kit / adapter to go between the tie rod and the upright. Something about moving something approximately 40mm down.

Anyway, thanks heaps for the info guys. When I have a bit more time I will look into it more as it looks like their is a lot of info I need to get my head around so I understand exactly what I'm chasing.

If you just want to fix the tie rod angle (it should be parallel to the ground like the LCA), moonface or Ikeya formula sell this spaced down Tie rod end:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/moonface-racing-bump-adjust-tie-rod-end-set.html

Or you can wait for GKtech to release their RCA correction kit for R-chassis

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/s14-s15-40mm-roll-center-correction-kit.html

Or you can just get their full knuckle replacement which already has RC adjustment built into it

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/r-chassis-r32-r33-r34-front-super-lock-knuckles.html

Only thing is, they are built for more lock (drift oriented)

If you just want to fix the tie rod angle (it should be parallel to the ground like the LCA), moonface or Ikeya formula sell this spaced down Tie rod end:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/moonface-racing-bump-adjust-tie-rod-end-set.html

Or you can wait for GKtech to release their RCA correction kit for R-chassis

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/s14-s15-40mm-roll-center-correction-kit.html

Or you can just get their full knuckle replacement which already has RC adjustment built into it

http://www.gktech.com/index.php/r-chassis-r32-r33-r34-front-super-lock-knuckles.html

Only thing is, they are built for more lock (drift oriented)

None of those things fix the problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...