Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , recently killed another battery which was a Century NS60S 430CCA claimed standard replacement .

Never liked these because I thought they were too small and more like a 4 cylinder battery .

I went to Batteries Direct at Peakhurst in Sydney because a friend works nearby and recommends them .

I wanted a battery more like 530 CCA and one that can fit is a Century EB58 which is intended for Fords .

Length wise basically same as NS60S but wider and fits between the alternative mounting rod holes .

Also these are a large pole battery unlike the small ones in the previous battery , never liked those particularly the smaller earth one .

My earth lead had been remade to a larger one with the std two hole fitting reused and an eye fitted to the battery end .

I bought new terminals with rings machined in their holes to bite in a bit better . They connect to the cables with a stainless eye bolt .

I had a spare positive cable from a wreck so I cut the outer part of the pressed clamp off and used the original hole , enlarged , to bolt to the new terminal .

Also bought a new clamp bar because the old one isn't long enough .

So now have a wider 540CCA battery which should crank a cold RB25 over a bit better this winter .

Take care cheers A .

Actually people I stuffed up with which Century range battery I bought . If I'd looked at the Ultra Hi Performance instead of the High Performance range I could have had a 620 rather than 540 Cold Cranking Amp rating in the same physical size . Bugger ...

A .

Almost certainly more expensive and a bit heavier , sounds like more lead in its plates . I think from memory the Century Ultra High Performance version is called a 68 but check before buying . Physically same dimensions as the High Performance 58EB I have .

An 820CCA battery would no doubt start an RD28 Diesel six . What battery is your one ?

A .

https://parts.cat.com/en/catcorp/premium-high-output/230-6368

Had the cut/move small locating tab, new bracket across the top and usual cable/terminal upgrades for bigger posts. Think it was $160 from memory

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...