Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive brought all the gear needed to do a RB30DET build, just have a few questions though.

1. Ive been told i can use the vl rods, just need to heat treat them, would this be alright for 400hp appications. Is it possible to use the rods out of the R32 rb25DE block which i have. Are they the same length as the vl rods? (haven't pulled engine apart yet)

2. Do you think it is worth while sticking a 240degree exhaust cam out of my old Rb20DET, and replacing it with a 232 exhaust cam which is in the R32 RB25DE head. Is this possible because i know the lifts are different and proberly need to change springs aswell. Can it be done?

3. The vl's use a 87mm piston. I know i can use a 87.5mm piston to give me about 3067cc. Would a bore of 1mm to 88mm giving a capacity of 3102cc be to extreme for a high horsepower engine. I was looking to put a set of Arias pistons in.

Any feedback will be great, as i want to get it running soon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45914-questions-about-rb30det-build/
Share on other sites

Ive brought all the gear needed to do a RB30DET build, just have a few questions though.

1. Ive been told i can use the vl rods, just need to heat treat them, would this be alright for 400hp appications. Is it possible to use the rods out of the R32 rb25DE block which i have. Are they the same length as the vl rods? (haven't pulled engine apart yet)

2. Do you think it is worth while sticking a 240degree exhaust cam out of my old Rb20DET, and replacing it with a 232 exhaust cam which is in the R32 RB25DE head. Is this possible because i know the lifts are different and proberly need to change springs aswell. Can it be done?

3. The vl's use a 87mm piston. I know i can use a 87.5mm piston to give me about 3067cc. Would a bore of 1mm to 88mm giving a capacity of 3102cc be to extreme for a high horsepower engine. I was looking to put a set of Arias pistons in.

Any feedback will be great, as i want to get it running soon.

Short answers.

1. VL rods are 6" (152.5 mm) while RB25/26 rods are 4.8" (121.5 mm). If you want your pistons 15.5 mm down the bore, then I suppose you could use RB25/26 rods in an RB30, but the comression ratio would sure be low. RB30 rods will handle up to ~500 bhp standard, just use a set of ARP rod bolts.

2. I don't understand the question. Simple answer though, spend a coupla hundred bucks and stick a set of RB26 cams in the R32 RB25DE head, they fit straight in. No VVT on R32 RB25DE's.

3 Standard VL bore is 86 mm, with the standard 85 mm stroke, that gives 2,964 cc's. Personally I wouldn't go bigger than 87.5 mm bore which gives 3,068cc's. Some people reckon even that is too far, you should only go to 86.5 mm (2,998 cc's).

I think I covered all I could understand anyway. ;)

Ive read the first 23pages of the R33 Conversion thread, and it hasn't covered some questions i need answers to.

1. Is it possible just to use the R32 RB25DE inlet plenum for the conversion, with a R32 RB20DET wiring loom, or do i have to use the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum.

2. Does the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum bolt up to the R32 RB25DE head without any issues?

3. What size injectors are the R32 RB25DE, and R32 RB20DET?

4. If the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum bolts up to the R32 RB25DE head, what size and type of injector can be used that will fit the RB20DET fuel rail, to make 400hp+?

Ive read the first 23pages of the R33 Conversion thread, and it hasn't covered some questions i need answers to.

1. Is it possible just to use the R32 RB25DE inlet plenum for the conversion, with a R32 RB20DET wiring loom, or do i have to use the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum.

2. Does the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum bolt up to the R32 RB25DE head without any issues?

3. What size injectors are the R32 RB25DE, and R32 RB20DET?

4. If the R32 RB20DET inlet plenum bolts up to the R32 RB25DE head, what size and type of injector can be used that will fit the RB20DET fuel rail, to make 400hp+?

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. RB20DET = 270 cc's, RB25DE = don't know, try Meggala's web site

4. Any top feed injector, Rochester, Denso, Jecs, Bosch etc etc. Around 450 cc's will be plenty. The only thing is to make sure you match the impedance with the ECU you are using, standard is high impedance. If the ECU will handle low impedance, then GTR injectors will just about make 400 bhp.

Hope that answered your questions :P

Here's 2 pics. The first is the rb25de inlet manifold with the inlet/head gasket on top, showing port size to gasket shape. Notice its a good fit.

The second shows the same rb25de gasket sitting on top of the rb20 inlet manifold ports that go into the head. Note the size difference.

I used the top rb20 collector (part tb is on) and the rb25de lower half to bolt to the head.

edit/ rb25de injectors are the same as the rb20 ones...

edit 2/ straight drop in replacement injectors are rx7 series 5, part # 195500-1370. These are 550cc injectors, but require tuning to use properly...

How do i go about geting the right compression ratios?

If i use a set of 86.5mm Arias pistons i'll get a capacity of 2998cc. Ive heard the RB25DE heads have between 62-64cc combustion chambers. Also a 0.5mm head gasket will give an extra 17.6cc to the combustion chambers.

So if i compress 499.7cc into a 66cc combustion you get a ~7.6:1 ratio which is low.

What would i have to do in order to get a more desirable ratio of say 8.5:1 ??

Well this is a job for a proper engine builder (cos i didn't even attempt to assemble it :D)

All i know (which isn't much) is that we had our blocks bored 40 thou (twice) oversize to make it the 3.1 Lt. It had 20mm? (or thou?) decked off the top of the block, with a 3 layer metal head gasket. The engine buuilder said it was the ones used in the Group A racing, and also diesel engines....i think it has inbuilt o rings. As for cc of the head, the pic below shows what Joel's head worked out to be.

If -Joel- was here :D he would tell you about the squish band to work out....he knows more on that than i do.

Oh yer the pistons we used were Wiseco forgies, Part # K578M87, and i think Joel said compression worked out to be 8.2 - 8.4 : 1 somewhere in there. Also clearances were setup to run larger amounts of boost, ie 24 psi +

How do i go about geting the right compression ratios?

If i use a set of 86.5mm Arias pistons i'll get a capacity of 2998cc. Ive heard the RB25DE heads have between 62-64cc combustion chambers. Also a 0.5mm head gasket will give an extra 17.6cc to the combustion chambers.  

So if i compress 499.7cc into a 66cc combustion you get a ~7.6:1 ratio which is low.

What would i have to do in order to get a more desirable ratio of say 8.5:1 ??

Almost right, but You have to add the combustion chamber volume to the cylinder volume to calculate the compression ratio, so.........

499.7 + 66 = ~566

566 / 66 = 8.5 to 1

Other slight correction, a standard head gasket is ~1 mm thick (6cc's at 86.5 mm bore).

So the correct calc is..........

499.7 + 68 = ~568

56 / 68 = 8.4 to 1

Hope that helps :D

What you want to aim for is a piston that gives you a 0 deck height (flush with the top of the block)

Then use a 0.040"-0.050" headgasket, this will give you the optimal well close enough squish / quench height. Generall the closer the clearance the better but you also have to allow for rod stretch and high rpm and piston rock. Set it just that bit to close and you will have your piston kissing the head at high rpm.

Do a google on quench / squish and have a bit of a read.

Go for a set of custom pistons to suit your motor.

Joel did a lot of research on the topic of which pistons to use. All are good, as long as correct clearances, and run in procedures are followed. If anyone tells you to use any particular brand, ask them why? I like to hear good reasons why people use certain brands...not just that someone said "these are the best"

Saying that Joel and myself chose Wiseco. Do some research on the net and you will find that Wiseco supply most major piston companies (yes, including Jap companies) with their blanks, and or rings. These companies then machine the piston blanks to whatever design they want. Why not buy the pistons from the place that makes them?

Yes the 94407 belt is the correct one.

When selecting pistons make sure they have a 0mm deck height (come up flush with the top of the block when at TDC)

Thats all you really have to worry about. Then as I said previously with the headgasket it will give you a good squish/quench gap.

I havn't been able to find any information on the Arias pistons (deck height, compression height etc) Wiseco have their specs listed. Arias don't.

Joel did a lot of research on the topic of which pistons to use. All are good, as long as correct clearances, and run in procedures are followed. If anyone tells you to use any particular brand, ask them why? I like to hear good reasons why people use certain brands...not just that someone said "these are the best"

I agree there is no such things as "the best" when it comes to pistons. But there is "a best" for my requirements. So if you truly know your requirements you can easily choose. Some examples;

I want 22 mm gudgeon pins (standard is 21 mm), this give a larger bearing surface area on the pin for the little end bearing. On a high power engine this spreads the combustion load over a larger area, so less wear and higher power tolerance.

I want to use Total Seal Gapless rings, so I need a piston with the right sized ring grooves. I could machine any piston to suite, but that just adds unnecessary cost.

I want to be able to set up the compression ratio to wherever I think I need. So the piston crown has to be substantial enough to be machined if necessary. Plus it has to have a piston crown that gives good squish at the same time.

I want to choose the bore size, not just have 1 or 2 choices that may or may not suite my requirements.

I want consistency, I don't want to have to change the maching process and redo the calcs for every different brand of piston.

So I stick to one brand that satisfies me, but most likely not for everyone else. :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...