Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hint #3, it goes from 1.75kw to 5.5kw (assuming each divide is 1kw) in 34 kph, that's a very user unfriendly ~1,250 rpm.  :shake:

ok,

heres the graph,

makes 417kw on shoot.

23psi

garret t04 custom, ball bearing.

.

hey sydney kid,

mate yet again ur confusing me and prolly everyone else.english mate, english.

so s/k..lookin at the graph whats you opinion?

Dean

no cigar merli, t04 yes, but think the specs on this turbo are considerably smaller than the hks version

Not really... HKS T04S is only rated to 550hp, and the T04R at 600hp... If anything, that's LESS than what that car is making...

In any case, I was the closest, so I win... Gimme my cookie biatch!!! ;)

dean... I want one!... [uuhm excuse mr dumdass for a moment...but] that is a single turbo set up on a gtr ??right? By the way, what's the motor had done to it?

yep single setup, motor is built, forgies, oil system, cams etc.

if u want a single this is better option than the jap turbos for spool etc.

not a bad turbo for a stock bottom end and 350kw i reckon, probably even downsize a little for even better spool.

Not really... HKS T04S is only rated to 550hp, and the T04R at 600hp... If anything, that's LESS than what that car is making...

In any case, I was the closest, so I win... Gimme my cookie biatch!!! ;)

dunno much about hks t04s, except that i have imported 2 gtrs with t04 and both laggy pos.

your cheating, i think it may have helped that u picked up the car on your truck tonight with dyno sheet.

 :wassup:

Hey keep it hush hush, Merli doesn't need to know that!!!!

Either way that is one killer setup, got the best of both worlds, RESPONSE and POWER!!!!

Damn, wish I knew about this setup couple of months ago......

Can I please ask what size wheels/tyres this car was using, so I can put rpm against that graph? ;)

Serious-Seven: I wouldn't exactly say that was "no lag" :Oops:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...