Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So you recomend this to anyone who wants a powerfull "no lag" gtr ?

no,

i would recommend this to someone who wants to run a single with similar response to low mount twins, who wants more power than is availble with low mounts.

and b4 someone says it, i know this power is availble with low mounts, but would need minimum 2540s or t518z and both would spool similar to this,probably worse.

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Woohoo! I guessed single turbo, but HKS T04, not Garrett T04 ;)

me > all of you fawk.gif

You guessed 3 possible turbos, one set of which was twin low mounts:

"A bit hard to say with no peak power figure, but I have my money on a single turbo.

Perhaps a Trust T67 or HKS T04/GT3040....

Hmmm.... or could they be elusive AX53B60 turbos?"

How that makes you greater than everyone else is interesting.

You guessed 3 possible turbos, one set of which was twin low mounts:

How that makes you greater than everyone else is interesting.

edit: fcuk it... I couldn't be fcuked.

First person to make my ignore list on SAU. Congratulations.

Wow... 19" wheels and dials up 417kw ;) Impressive :D

4th Gear Speeds:

2000 - 59km/h

2500 - 74 km/h

3000 - 89 km/h

3500 - 104 km/h

4000 - 119 km/h

4500 - 134 km/h

5000 - 148 km/h

5500 - 163 km/h

6000 - 178 km/h

6500 - 193 km/h

7000 - 208 km/h

7500 - 223 km/h

8000 - 238 km/h

8500 - 252 km/h

I'll put them on the graph now :)

Uneven spacing of RPM... Where have I gone wrong? ;)

upi_dyno.jpg

for comparison sake, here is a dyno sheet from a few weeks ago , same car but with hks t51spl(non bb).

only other changes, now has a slightly more restrictive exhaust(other one was too bloody loud ) now also has the wastegate plumbed in.

both dynos were done at around 23psi.

merli, maybe u could apply the speeds to this one.

just havin a lend of ya s/k.

so what do u think, give me your impressions, bearing in mind, the aim was to get around 400kw.

Its a dog ;) ... i thought with those sorts of number the owner may have put an RB20 from a GTS4 in it...those numbers seem about right for an RB20 :rofl:

What sort of compression ratio is the car running, and what level of boost to make that power...its always frightening to see a convex power curve like that, typically means good power delivery

23psi,

I feel light headed, i need to sit down :D

It makes that sort of power with that sort of response, at a little over 1.5bar. Im no expert but that is brilliant. Do you happen to know what cams and compression ratio the car is running... std stroke and no special fuel?

I notice that most dyno pritnouts with big numbers are usually concave curves, and doing the math, you get more urge if you reach the same number with a convex curve....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...