Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

also looking at it i doubt it has done those km's.

and if it has done those, it's done the hardest short run in history looking at the mods.

Wasn't skaifes ADM for sale a couple of years ago for around $70k? and it had done fark all km's

That was the GTR to buy.

Or Bobs.

But i doubt he will part with it hahaha

It was actually $130,000.00 with 14,000kms...........

Not sure what happened to it but the ad was pulled after about 3 weeks.

Bob.

PS: You're right, I would part with it. I'd rather sell a kidney! :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

post-78207-0-93004000-1447192710_thumb.jpg

This car came through at the auctions probably 1 month ago now. Sold for what would have been around 50k aud delivered from memory.

Iron chef found a car for me. The purchase is not complete so don't want to say too much just yet.

Thanks to all those who were on the lookout

Feel free to close thread mods.

Car I found is grade 4, 60,000kms with full service history. Car seems to be in great condition according to the pictures.

Now the long wait begins....

  • Like 1

Feel free to close thread mods.

Car I found is grade 4, 60,000kms with full service history. Car seems to be in great condition according to the pictures.

Now the long wait begins....

Is it the Gunmetal Grey 1994 model, 64,000 km?

If so....... It looks good.

Bob.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...