Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Geoffrey,.... unlike most others offering advice on here, I have actually tested this swap. I've also witnessed the same results on 2 other attempts by people who believed the falacy that this is a good mod.

If you like a lumpy idle, 7-8" idle vacumn, weak bottom end power, flat mid range power and a mediocre top end then this is the "upgrade" for you!

As to why it doesn't work, here is the answer - Cam doctor the GTR cams at .00" valve clearance and you will find the valve is off the seat for over 300degs. That explains the lumpy idle etc. However the lift for 60+ degs of that 300degs is less than .020"(0.5mm). So bugger all airflow and a lot of reversion etc.....basically the engine is now a crap airpump and behaves as such. If Others can overcome these major shortcomings and get a performance increase, then they must be REALLY good tuners .

I did actually dyno a good RB30/25 with GTR cams and it made 250rwkw, however when I tossed them and reinstalled the RB25 cams, hey presto we now have 325kws, smooth idle with 20" vac, spooled way earlier , strong mid range etc, etc.

Maybe I just had a "dud" set.

As for dynosheets, I do have them on the dyno harddrive, but the results were so pathetic I never even bothered to print/compare them to the final result.

Maybe get the people who have such great success to show you the dynosheets of the results they are so proud of. I have yet to see any????? how about you????

I have no axe to grind here, just tired of "internet fallacies" being perpetuated.

I'd much rather see you spending your time on things that actually make your car faster.

cheers,

B.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

...Cam doctor the GTR cams at .00" valve clearance and you will find the valve is off the seat for over 300degs. That explains the lumpy idle etc. However the lift for 60+ degs of that 300degs is less than .020"(0.5mm). So bugger all airflow and a lot of reversion etc.....basically the engine is now a crap airpump and behaves as such.  

Makes sense:) software certainly helps i imagine...any experience with RB20s and cam upgrades? I want to stick with the std valve springs etc but unsure whether i should go 260 or 270deg cams with about 8.5-8.8mm lift...or a combination of both for inlet and exhaust?

Im not worried if i lose bottom end say under 3,000rpm, but between 4,000rpm to 8,000rpm id like measureable gains...even if it means making the same power but with less boost.

That said if a cam will work well enough to help low to mid as well as helping the engine make a bit more power at 6,500-7,000rpm then im happy. At the moment i have about 220-230rwkws with about 1.2-1.3bar. No one ever bothers with RB20s so hard to get a feel for what cam/s works if any?!?!?!!?

  • 2 weeks later...

Mate that's the sort of info I like to hear and possubly timely advice. Just as an aside, did you Cam Doctor the RB25DET cams as well? I definitely note a ramped flank on the cam lobe as well, but noticeably lower than the RB26 cams. I am hoping to get away with buying a new dial indicator before the finance minister catches me with the cash tin so I can map the cams and dial in an appropriate overlap in the old schoool fashion before drive on dynos were available so maybe I'll get up to speed on the doctor and take a look as well.

Alternatively I may also have the flanks ground down to get lift without the side effects.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...