Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

My Microtech LT12 busted - so I managed to work out what was wrong with my PFC and Q45 AFM - so I got that working now.

However, after going back to the PFC - I get a strange problem when the car revs to say 4000 RPM then back down to idle - it will stall.

If the revs come down slowly - it's OK - just when the revs come down quickly - it will try to maintain idle but stall.

I've taken it to a tuner who says the PFC settings are OK - there is something else wrong.

Have changed spark plugs and fuel filter , etc - cleaned the AFM.

I've tried adjusting the throttle body stop and idle control valve in many combiniations -

The only thing that works is to keep the revs at idle at 1300-1400 - which is silly.

Once at idle - it seems to be fine - 900 RPM - stays there rock solid, no hunting or anything.

Its just when the revs come down quickly from > 4000 RPM it will stall.

I thought it might have something to do with the lightened flywheel. But it worked Ok with the microtech (however I don't really know how the Microtech was tuned)

Anyway - if you have any ideas - let me know...

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/
Share on other sites

Yes to Cams - Tomei 256/9

Yes to BOV

But they were there when the PFC worked OK - (ie before HKS 3040 and Microtech)

What's HKS EIDS ???

Might be Cam gear - I was told that with Tomei cams - the cam exh cam gear needs to be set to 0 - mine is not - I bet that what it is ......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950643
Share on other sites

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=hks+eids...-8&start=0&sa=N

http://edgetuning.co.uk/product.html?id=hk...gory=elecothers

http://www.greenline.jp/catalogue/bblist.php?brand=HKS

It's a doo hickey that 'electronic idle stablises'.

It's a bandaid IMO because the FC should do it fine but it's useful on save extreme tune cars.

T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950680
Share on other sites

Actually - yeah - it might be the BOV. I recall that it did this (not to the extent that it does now though) before the 3040 went on .

Interested to hear from Steve - did/do you have this probelm ?

I recall on Merli's ex GTS-t - the BOV was positioned on the plenum side of the cooler - mine is on the turbo side.......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950881
Share on other sites

This sounds like a classic case of atmo-venting BOV still cracked open causing the car to stall on rapid decelleration...

You're going along nicely at 4000rpm, light up ahead goes red. You quickly release the throttle, shutting the throttle butterfly and causing the BOV to vent. But the BOV isn't wound tight enough and is still a little bit open as the car decellerates. You hit 3000rpm, 2000rpm, 1000rpm. Your BOV is still a little bit open and leaking all that air out. You engine senses that loss of air, can't keep revs up, and stalls.

Solution: Tighen BOV / Buy different BOV with much tighter spring (e.g. move from Bltz DD BOV to Trust Type-R) / Put on a recirculating BOV / Just make sure you don't let the revs drop too quickly and always keep the clutch engaged until about 1200rpm

;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950900
Share on other sites

I have the same problem as you. But I still have the stock ECU and MAF. When I put my larger turbo on I couldn't use the stock intake piping so I put my HKS SSQ back on. I never had idle problems with the HKS and stock turbo.

I found with the larger turbo it stalls out if I let the revs drop too fast. It's a real PITA! I noticed my A/F ratio goes to 10:1 when the RPM's are droping down. I think the stalling problem has to do with there being much less volume of Air between the MAF and Turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950913
Share on other sites

hey bman mine dies if u like floor it in first gear all the way to redline then just suddenly put the clutch in - i have a microtech - cams arent in yet and i dont have a bov on at all

i still have to get mine 100% tuned as its only on a road tune atm

i do have a custom plenum and xf throttle body with 200sx tps sensors with correct voltage

anyone got any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-950995
Share on other sites

I'm fairly sure mine is the BOV - it's a turbosmart supersonic plumbed back to the air filter. - I'll try unplumbing it first. Then I might remove it just for a test.

I think the trick might be to reposition the BOV as far away from the AFM as possible.

Kamikaze - It sounds like yours is a tuning problem. BTW - the Ford Explorer TPS works with the Microtech and the PFC too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-951004
Share on other sites

Well - I just tried the BOV setting on hard / soft - no difference.

I took the BOV off completely and checked it for leaks and bad o-rings - but it all looks good.

I blocked the BOV flange whilst it was off - and same problem - but I sort of expected that - as there would be a fiar amount of reversion from the 3040 - which would affect the AFM.

I reckon I need to change BOVs or re-position it to the other side of the cooler.

Or even get one of those EIDS thingys.... is there a Non HKS branded one of these that is less expensive ??

So the Trust Type R BOV is a good one hey - how much are these ?? /me runs off to search the web.....

Fundage is a bit low ATM.....

Cheers,

Any other suggestions welcome.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-951060
Share on other sites

Yeah - that's what I mean - mine is not on the plenum side right now. (I have Greddy front facing plenum so non-atmo plumbing is a bit hard)

By changing it to the plenum side I'm sort of hypothesising that there will be more volume so that reversion won't be so much of a problem -

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-951076
Share on other sites

Thanks Tony - UAS reckon that they can tune it out -

I've been reading the "this low rmp idle problem" thread - or whatever it is called - and 'the phantom' reckons that a thing called a dashpot is the go

From what I understand - it attaches to the TB - and lets the butterfly open quickly, but close slowly - which fixes the reversion problem ..

I'll see how I go with the tune -

then maybe look into the EIDS or Dashpot thing

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-956303
Share on other sites

A couple of things to look at if you havent already,

Have you still got the mesh on the AFM?

Check your fuel cut recovery rpm on the power fc - should be around 1200rpm - go into settings then idle - under your redline setting is the fuel cut recovery rpm for ac on and ac off.

Also, have you tried winding your AAC valve open a couple of turns?

Hope it helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46849-idle-issues/#findComment-956363
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...