Jump to content
SAU Community

Interesting Dyno results 2530 / setting up the tiing with a dial gauge


menthol369
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
On 15/01/2017 at 10:43 AM, KiwiRS4T said:

That explanation doesn't make sense to me. Saying that  the printed mph/kph figure is too  unreliable to convert to rpm means you have given up on getting accurate data. . Given that for many purposes the ecu requires an accurate rpm signal it would seem that the tuner hasn't gone to enough trouble to make the necessary connections to get a proper rpm reading. 

Seeing videos of people sitting in the boot of cars trying to stop tyre slip on dynos is another reason why i think hub dynos are by far preferable.

Ok, Basically dyno doesn't actually read rpm for any of its primary calcs except derived torque, the power and motive force are calculated directly off road speed based on pressure applied to the load cell, then you have have a few other calculations going on to get derived torque based off either an input on the dyno to measure rpm or off a user set rpm based off road speed. so the primary scale for all dynos is actually road speed on a roller, or hub rpm on a hub, (hub rpm is very different to engine rpm) to get rpm readings on some cars can be a real prick, even with you have inductive and primary based pickups, as some cars especially ones with msd units will fire more than once giving really stupid readings on inductive pickups if you cant access the tach output on the msd box (very common occurrence when idiots have mounted the box right up under the dash behind alot of crap)
also the rpm pickups are sensitive to interference that can make them unreliable at times, my own person car that works well on my dyno 95% of the time still has the occasional run where the pickup gets some interference off something else on the car and gives me readings of like 30krpm, where as because the road speed pickup is always dead accurate to the result. (not saying the dynos road speed is the same as actual road speed as tyre slip and crap puts that out a fair bit,if you have a decent tach input and graph rpm vs kph you can see this very easily )
in terms of tuning, the only time it really matters is it makes it a bit quicker to do the ramp testing high load stuff yet even then there's still delays in fueling from wide-band placement and how quick the engine accelerates means your rarely adjusting the 5krpm cells for a issue with 5krpm on the plot and as far at steady state lower load situations all the ecu side of tuning, the tuning software and logging software on the laptop your tuning with gets a perfect rpm signal direct from the ecu your adjusting (sometimes this signal can be fed direct to the dyno to depending on dyno and ecu brand and what level of options you have on the dyno) so in terms of tuning the dyno having the rpm reading isn't a huge advantage all the time.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...