Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wallbro fuel pump

Hi all,

i am new to this forum, as i have learnt so many things from this page. I have an issue hoping to resolve through this page if possible. 

The thing is i have replaced my stock fuel pump to wallbro 250 high flow fuel pump. As mine stock pump was playing up and one day it ended not working so replaced to wallbro. My car is r33 s2 97 all stock.

Well, i called one of mine mechanic freiend to install it for me as i have no idea to install. 

As far as i know he just replaced the pump used the same wiring as the stock. 

And performances is fluctuating. 

When i fill the tank to the max the car lags the power and tend to go power cut and need to re start again and even if the fuel is about the quater  happens the same. 

If i take sharp turn to left or right power tries to cut off. Called my mechanic friend explain it to him he has no idea. 

I just bought it 3 months ago havent enjoyed it yet.

any idea regarding this issue. I know some brother will help this brother for sure...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471346-wallbro-fuel-pump/
Share on other sites

First thing are you sure it's fuel pump that was issue if you are still having issues? Assuming it is, the fuel pump runs at 2 different voltages, a lower voltage and a higher voltage at full throttle. Does it still lag if full throttle? Possibly the lower voltage is to much for the new pump. If so you can hard wire bypass the voltage step, plenty advice on SAU if you Google. Also very importantly make sure you are not getting an engine light or anything when testing this, if there is a fuel supply issue you don't want knock or leaning out.

Normally the Walbro will work ok as a straight replacement. (It works better directly wired, but that's another story).

Because it is smaller than the stock pump it has to be properly secured in the cradle. The sock (filter) has to be properly attached, The stock wiring should be fine.

Run the petrol in your tank down to nearly empty and check out the pump for yourself. remove the fuel lines and wind off the retaining ring (it may be very tight) and have a look (a torch would be handy)..If it looks dodgy get your mechanic mate to come round and fix it.

  • Like 1

Hi dear,

thanks for your reply

the thing we did before putting the wallbro

pulled the entire cradle and assembled.

changed the after market shockto standard as the standard one was longer than after market.

while puttng it back we placed accordingly the one it was before.

it was working fine for week or 2 and its getting worst. If i am over 50 on the street get my car to the puddle powercuts.. its weird..

 

 

 

You could check to see if the cradle is still where it is supposed to be. Of course the problem could be elsewhere. Have you changed the filter in the engine bay? Get a fuel pressure gauge and see if you are getting the correct pressure. Fuel Pressure Regulators rarely fail but its a possibility

Check the wiring at the pump - especially for a clean earth..

Is there any chance the vapour and fuel return hoses have been switched by mistake.  I had this happen on a previous car (  wasn't a skyline) and it would frequently end up in fuel pooling in the manifold and cutting out.

How did you go mate?

As others have said, check your hoses.

What I would do immediately, as someone who has just installed a Walbro pump myself, is rewire the pump. At the bare minimum, supply the pump with a new earth to the chassis. Otherwise you can go with a full relay set up, hwoever, with a stock car I don't think you need it.

I'm betting on incorrect installation. When I installed my Walbro I had to angle grind the brass bit off the bottom of the cradle and get a longer length of fuel hose. for the pump to sit in the correct spot. You should confirm your friend did something similar (at bare minimum ensuring the pump is placed lower so it sits correctly).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...