Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys hoping someone here can clear this up for me. If this question has been explained before then please let me know with a link if possible to the thread. Have tried looking up an answer myself but it's proving difficult.

 

I'm in the process of upgrading my engine(RB25DET NEO), I had originally decided to upgrade the injectors but keep a low mount turbo, meaning all my intake pipes could be left as is. Now however I'm thinking of going top mount and getting a front facing plenum. My question is, will my injectors fit? Denso 570cc GTR injectors. Will they require a new fuel rail with the plenum or can the standard rail be used? Does it depend on the particular plenum? Any info on this whole topic would be brilliant.

Thanks in advance.

PFA97a35d48307d95a0fcc05986aa9269e8.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/472593-front-facing-plenum-and-fuel-rail/
Share on other sites

My advice is don't go forward facing plenum. Not really worth the extra hassle.

Will your injectors fit? No way of knowing it depends on what fuel rail and manifold you want to run.

If i was you i would just leave the intake side alone aside from running plazmaman style cooler piping.

IF you are going to replace the plenum man, I'd recommend getting something like a Plazmaman. Don't go the GReddy.

 

I've done both and its so much easier with the Plazzy, you keep the lower runners and a lot of the stock plumbing.

Not after the power mate I have all the supporting mods I need for the power. 570cc injectors, link G4 ECU, splitfire coilpacks, upgraded fuel pump, AFM. I was gona get a rebuilt hybrid low mount turbo but the more I look at top mount the more I want it [emoji23] Seems that FF plenum will require a non standard fuel rail. Can anyone say this for certain or does it depend on the particular plenum used?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...