Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What are you comparing the RB20 woth when you say more punchy/torquey. SR20?

You dont need to stroke it to go 2.2L, just overbore the engine, which means a lot of labour and new pistons so expensive if all your looking for is more torque.

If you want torque then a 2L turbo engine in a 1350kg car is perhaps not the right car to start with. That said you can do things like breathing mods, cam gears etc etc that all helps torque, or you can change the diff ratio to make the thing more punchy, but at the end if the day its a 2L engine...modern cars and technology sometimes spoil us rotten and we forget that we cant have everything.

But a good place to start is full exhaust, good filter and intake, cam gears apparantly work well, if you need a new clutch then only get as big as you need and go for a lightened flywheel at the same time, and throw a shorter diff ratio at it and lern to use those 7,500revs, and stay away from 18" chrome wheels.

Im probably wrong but thats the way i look at it

What are a few things that can be done to make the rb20det a bit more responsive. and have a bit more torque?  Like the sr20det...

How much would it cost all up to have it stroked to 2.2 or 2.3 ltr?  Would this be a good idea?

What mods do you have? If its relatively stock I'd try an ECU + dyno tune and a lighter flywheel.

well my 1st car was an r32gts4 and i wasnt too happy with power until about 3800rpm.

I then bought a 180sx.. it felt nicer at low rpm.. but for some reason i like the r32 so much more.. so ive sold the 180sx and now looking for a clean r32 again..

I want it set up for drift as much as possible which is why i want a more responsive engine...

I would love an rb25det r32 if anybody knows of one!

rb25 definitely.. if you can afford it..

i am "downgrading" to an rb20det for a while until i go for a monster engine. Will be interesting to feel the difference.

Have been in a couple of r32, and more nothing, then on.. rb25det is much nicer..

some of the better rb20det turbos are meant to spool up a bit lower and give much nicer response down low.. HKS2530 and things like that. You could research into those a bit more.

well my 1st car was an r32gts4 and i wasnt too happy with power until about 3800rpm.

I then bought a 180sx.. it felt nicer at low rpm.. but for some reason i like the r32 so much more.. so ive sold the 180sx and now looking for a clean r32 again..    

I want it set up for drift as much as possible which is why i want a more responsive engine...

I would love an rb25det r32 if anybody knows of one!

hi there,

there's a guy selling what seems to be a very nice R32 GTS-T with nice bits and pieces on it, so if you're interested, check this out;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=31815

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...