Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've decided to use my GTR's engine as a guinea pig for a light weight alloy front pulley.

In a few months a mate is going to have two Rb26 long motors from which we will use the front pulley to have a copy made in lightweight alloy.

It is my belief that the 'harmonic' issue people have suggested is not an issue at all for an engine that will see less than 8,000rpm , is a street motor with less than 600hp , and will only ever occasionally see a drag strip appart from regular road driving. To date the only evidence given of a front pulley having conection with harmonic block cracking is the reports from the early group A days when the front balancer was re-designed. My optimistic take on this is that the regular factory rb26 crank needs work in the counterweight area to address the sustained high rpm use. Seems there are a few factorys making upgraded cranks for this reason. Attempting to externally balance the engine is a bandaid.

Since my engine is over 230,000kms old if there are any 'harmonic' issues I expect it will show up rather quickly.

Anyway I'm happy to continue the debate and provide a real working example.

the harmonic balancer is balanced in con-junction with you crank... its weight is vital to your crank shaft being balanced over the main journals and big ends having a lighter one will throw this out and probably throw a rod through the block as well!!!! THere are no harmonic imbalances in a rb26!!! The haromonic balancer is also a dampner and the reason it is often steel is due to its better resenence frequency as opposed to alloy!!! You cannot internally balance a crank on its own as there will always be the flywheel and clutch hanging off one end. the balancer also is there to counterweight these!!! I would talk to an engine builder not just a mechanic before you decide to do this!!! Hope this sheads some light on the problems associated with this!!!

Cheers, Daniel.

the harmonic balancer is balanced in con-junction with you crank... its weight is vital to your crank shaft being balanced over the main journals and big ends having a lighter one will throw this out and probably throw a rod through the block as well!!!! THere are no harmonic imbalances in a rb26!!! The haromonic balancer is also a dampner and the reason it is often steel is due to its better resenence frequency as opposed to alloy!!! You cannot internally balance a crank on its own as there will always be the flywheel and clutch hanging off one end. the balancer also is there to counterweight these!!! I would talk to an engine builder not just a mechanic before you decide to do this!!! Hope this sheads some light on the problems associated with this!!!

Cheers, Daniel.

daniel,

It's not a harmonic balancer. It has a tortional vibration function not a balancing function, very different things. your on the wrong track.

Look at the description of the crank pulley in the GTR manual. There is a fair bit covered in a previous thread on this issue.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ighlight=pulley

Thanks for your input none the less.

Did I say 230,000kms?

I meant 237,000kms. Engine runs very well for a grandpa and thats testimony to a good service history. Oh, it has had a full life too with track days and hill climbs and things.

rev i have been led to believe that the so called balancer issues in the early group a's were to do with no.1 cank main journal issues on a batch of n1 engines!!!

I cant get that thread to open, can everybody else if not maybe Prank can see if its bugged!!! I believe you can reduce the mass by a degree but i would be scared of cutting the weight in half and using a very non conductive and non acoustic metal such as alloy!!! Also the stock harmonic balancer isnt just a chunk of metal it is actually cleverly designed, i know i shouldnt say the factory wouldnt have done it like this if they could do it better cause that is such an unrelated comment for so many other things but the harmonics of a crank is a very detailed thing.. an un-related example you jsut dont change the main journal size cause you think it can be done different or better, these are the areas where all the research hours go when creating an engine...and its the same for dampening they spend many hours trying to get the engine smooth and vibration free through r&d on thinks like the balancer(Sorry to call it that even though the crank is what is balanced) But again you have your reasons i have mine just adding to the discussion!!!!

rev i have been led to believe that the  so called balancer issues in the early group a's were to do with no.1 cank main journal issues on a batch of n1 engines!!!

I cant get that thread to open, can everybody else if not maybe Prank can see if its bugged!!! I believe you can reduce the mass by a degree but i would be scared of cutting the weight in half and using a very non conductive and non acoustic metal such as alloy!!! Also the stock harmonic balancer isnt just a chunk of metal it is actually cleverly designed, i know i shouldnt say the factory wouldnt have done it like this if they could do it better cause that is such an unrelated comment for so many other things but the harmonics of a crank is a very detailed thing.. an un-related example you jsut dont change the main journal size cause you think it can be done different or better, these are the areas where all the research hours go when creating an engine...and its the same for dampening they spend many hours trying to get the engine smooth and vibration free through r&d on thinks like the balancer(Sorry to call it that even though the crank is what is balanced) But again you have your reasons i have mine just adding to the discussion!!!!

It's all good I'm very happy to have the input. And of course I need plenty of people to say 'I told you so' when it doesn't work :)

Something from the thread I mentioned for those who can't open it...

I think we are getting the pulleys confused with the harmonic dampers found on some V6 / V8 engines. "Harmonic Balancer" is a term that is used loosely in the automotive industry. Technically, this type of device does not exist. The "balancer" part comes from engines that are externally balanced and have a counterweight cast into the damper, hence the merging of the two terms. None of the applications that we are talking about utilize a counterweight as part of the pulley as these engines are internally balanced.

The pulleys on most of the new import and smaller domestic engines have an elastomer (rubber ring) incorporated into the pulley that looks similar to a harmonic damper. The elastomer in the OEM pulley serves as an isolator, which is there to suppress natural vibration and noise from the engine itself, the A/C compressor, P/S pump, and alternator. This is what the manufacturers call NVH (Noise Vibration & Harshness) when referring to noticeable noise and vibration in the passenger compartment. It is important to note that in these applications, this elastomer is somewhat inadequate in size, as well as life span, to act as an effective torsional damper. If you look at the pulleys on some of the imports there is no rubber to be found at all. Most who have installed and driven a vehicle with pulleys will notice the engine actually feels smoother. This is a natural result of replacing the heavy steel crank pulley with a CNC-machined aluminum pulley. NVH is variable and unique to every car. NVH will increase with the installation of an aftermarket intake and/or exhaust, for example. Think of OEM intake systems in newer cars, they use baffles and resonators in the intake to quiet all the intake noise. Aftermarket intakes eliminate these resonators and create dramatic increases in engine noise from the throttle opening and closing. So to most tuners, certain types of NVH can make the driving experience more enjoyable.

The purpose of a traditional harmonic damper is to protect against crank failure from torsional movement. This is not necessary in most modern engines because of the many advances in engine design and materials. Factors such as stroke, displacement, inline, V configurations, power output, etc., do determine when and how these harmonics and torsional movements occur.

Again, there is a lot of internet hearsay about the pulleys. When motor failures occur, too often people are quick to blame the pulley first, rather than taking the time to look logically into why there was a problem.

Here's a few examples of successful front pulley change overs on 6 cyl:

BMW M series , 5 series, Audi A6 ,Toyota the whole range of 6's found in supras including NA's and turbo's. This is a small sample of the straight 6's that can live without the harmonic balancer. All have had the front pulley replacement and none have had premature bearing failure as a direct result.

Food for thought.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...