Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All,

 

i am installing my walbro fuel pump this weekend. I understand the r34 gtt standard wiring uses a two stage fuel relay so on idle it cuts fuel or supply much less voltage (11v ) than 13.5 v.

 

my question is, i normally use a joint coupler with heat shrink covers. Is that ok inside a fuel pump? Obviously i will do the connection outsite of the fuel pump and then put it back in to the fuel pump.

 

i don’t think you can use electrical tape, can you ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475982-r34-walbro-255-fuel-pump/
Share on other sites

I'm maybe thinking more along the lines of a small I.D silicone fuel resistant hose (small motor fuel hose) line the exposed wiring/solder joint with something like https://www.supercheapauto.com.au/p/permatex-permatex-fuel-resistant-gasket-sealant-85420/356517.html and slip the silicone fuel resistant hose over it. the gasket sealant is non hardening so should keep even a slightly loose hose in place permanently as the sealant wont harden. Best I can come up with man hope it helps!

Thanks, will check it out

 

i am pretty worried on what happengs if positive and negative touch inside the fuel tank.

 

i think answer is spark and then boom. Have fine japaniese engeenering not thought of this?

 

even if fused, a small spark is enough to blow up the car with 60 liters of gas

 

re wire, i am thinking of soldering, what do you recon?

There can't be a boom in a sealed file tank even if the wires touch. No oxygen.

 

When I do pumps I offet the joints, so they can't touch and the use a piece of submersible fuel line over the positive joint. Like heat shrink but not shrunk.  None have exploded, so that's a pretty good result.

4 hours ago, drifter17a said:

If for whatever reason they do, screw coming loose?

 

lots of diy jumps simply use a wire connector so they could be setting up a death trap 

 

just amazed really on how stupied the design is

 

 

Too rich to ignite, even if you arched something inside the tank it won't ignite, even if created a physical spark it still won't ignite.

Engineers aren't stupid :)

 

8 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Too rich to ignite, even if you arched something inside the tank it won't ignite, even if created a physical spark it still won't ignite.

Engineers aren't stupid :)

 

that is what I didn't know :)

 

well I was going mad getting all sort of sleeve to ensure they won't touch ...

5 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

If you don't believe us take off your petrol lid and drop a match in

will do later this evening, use my blow tourch .

 

i wonder why in the UK there is an old trick of calling the police and asking for a car to be removed which seems to have been abandoned by removing fuel cap and saying it is a fire hazard.

 

normally when the car is taxed( road tax) and MOT( mechanical check once a year) then they won't remove it but it if it annoying you people do above

 

14 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

If you don't believe us take off your petrol lid and drop a match in

Do not do this on a warm day, there will just enough fuel vapours and just enough air to ignite, just as the match goes down into the fuel neck lol

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Do not do this on a warm day, there will just enough fuel vapours and just enough air to ignite, just as the match goes down into the fuel neck lol

Won’t go boom though.  Do it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...