Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

BNR32

Dead stock bar,

- PFC

- Nismo AFM's

- K&N's (dirty)

- Trust PEII cat back (80mm)

gallery_14713_1542_7995.jpg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bits

- GT35 Hybrid,

- 6boost manifold, 60mm gate

- Blitz ID III

- 4" zhaust from turbo to cat (then PEII)

- 044 in tank, dedicated +12v feed, twin feed rail, 700cc SARD's, SARD FPR

- Relocate battery to boot, full +12v feed to 044

- JUN 260 cams

- Ogura twin plate

- HICAS lock bar, cooler loop, all lines removed

- Battery relocate to boot

- Coilovers

- Defi's

- Billet oil filer remount & cooler

Edited by GeeTR

this is from when i bought it:

carzzz.jpg

and this is from sitting in my driveway for the last 4 months with a fcuked RB20

IMG_16771.jpg

mods so far:

HKS 3.5' turbo back exhaust

HKS 5' super dragger muffler

HKS mushroom pod filter

FMIC

Apexi progressive springs

thats all i can think of at the moment.

its going into trojan next week to be fitted with an RB25DET, KKR430 turbo, walbro fuel pump and a couple of other things

goodies going on aswell soon:

IMG_16811.jpg

Edited by MANG

Hey Hi GeeTR,

just curious if you've had the PEii tested for DB?

that's the exhuast I plan to get in the near future to replace my 3.5inch which is too loud. wanted to know if how legal it is.

cheers.

Michael

Hey Hi GeeTR,

just curious if you've had the PEii tested for DB?

that's the exhuast I plan to get in the near future to replace my 3.5inch which is too loud. wanted to know if how legal it is.

cheers.

Michael

Hey Michael,

Sure do. Came off the boat with a rusted out 3.5", that was almost falling off = 112dB

Put a PEII on tried again, and was much better at 98dB, which they "were" going to pass me for, but then i backed off, anit popped a 107dB on the overrun :)

If the PFC was in it then, i could just tweak the fuel at those values, or decel settings.

Alas, I then gota rear section made up that proved legal at 76dB or something ridiculous.

Conclusion: They are louder then you are allowed, but once past rego i think your fine, as they ARE a v.quiet system. I would suggest theres no way you would get pulled over due to noise. A point to note as well, i have two turbos and more twist and turns in the (stock) front section then those running a GTST. I actually think its too quiet :)

I think most RBs have a resonance tone at 2800-3200rpm ( about where Dickson ask you to rev it to) so this isn't really as loud as other setups that would register 98dB

When i get the 4" from turbo to cat, I might think bout making up a 4" rear section too. Will let you know if your keen on grabbing a 2nd hand system at some stage.

Sorry for long reply ( I thought there was to be no chit chat in this thread? ;) - hope it helps

- M

Hey Michael,

Sure do. Came off the boat with a rusted out 3.5", that was almost falling off = 112dB

Put a PEII on tried again, and was much better at 98dB, which they "were" going to pass me for, but then i backed off, anit popped a 107dB on the overrun :dry:

If the PFC was in it then, i could just tweak the fuel at those values, or decel settings.

Alas, I then gota rear section made up that proved legal at 76dB or something ridiculous.

Conclusion: They are louder then you are allowed, but once past rego i think your fine, as they ARE a v.quiet system. I would suggest theres no way you would get pulled over due to noise. A point to note as well, i have two turbos and more twist and turns in the (stock) front section then those running a GTST. I actually think its too quiet :happy:

I think most RBs have a resonance tone at 2800-3200rpm ( about where Dickson ask you to rev it to) so this isn't really as loud as other setups that would register 98dB

When i get the 4" from turbo to cat, I might think bout making up a 4" rear section too. Will let you know if your keen on grabbing a 2nd hand system at some stage.

Sorry for long reply ( I thought there was to be no chit chat in this thread? :wave: - hope it helps

- M

M-

thanks for that, i will definately add it to the list of things to buy when

cheers

Michael

Nope, Skylines going ASAP, had it for nearly 5 years, time for a change. plus the utes got more potential for less $ outlay (when warranty's finished)

Now thats what im talking about..

This is exactly y mine is up for sale..

Im goin for a BA/BF Ute. for work and fun.

Nice car mate.

Now thats what im talking about..

This is exactly y mine is up for sale..

Im goin for a BA/BF Ute. for work and fun.

Nice car mate.

there very nice to drive, so many more features and such a more refined car.

I never thought it would happen, but i now dislike driving the Skyline after the ute

looked at a BF ute, but just cost too much for what i wanted, plus losing so much just by driving it off the showroom was a detterent

there very nice to drive, so many more features and such a more refined car.

I never thought it would happen, but i now dislike driving the Skyline after the ute

looked at a BF ute, but just cost too much for what i wanted, plus losing so much just by driving it off the showroom was a detterent

they are a nice car to drive..

I was looking at an F6 Tornado. Hot ute..

Great to drive, but yea bit expensive for what i need it for.

Seems like the old school SAU'ers are moving to aussie built cars (looks at the VZ Clubsport sitting in his garage).

I agree with you though, both the newer Ford's/FPV's and Holdens/HSV's are nice cars and now that they actually have decent performance and reasonable handling, can take it to most of the JDM imports. I was actually quite stunned when the Clubby put down a GTR not once, not twice, but three times a few months ago.

Edited by Amaru

Bah you just need to go to a newer Jap car (looks in the direction of an Evo :domokun:)

Seems like the old school SAU'ers are moving to aussie built cars (looks at the VZ Clubsport sitting in his garage).

I agree with you though, both the newer Ford's/FPV's and Holdens/HSV's are nice cars and now that they actually have decent performance and reasonable handling, can take it to most of the JDM imports. I was actually quite stunned when the Clubby put down a GTR not once, not twice, but three times a few months ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
×
×
  • Create New...