Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I'm new to the site but not entirely new to RB's, I've had a customer at my shop who had two r32 GT-R's with rb26dett and a GTS-T with an rb20, we installed a ecumasters EMU on his rb26 with upgraded r34 twins, tuned in on e85 and made me fall in love with the sounds of these engines.

Fast forward to now, I've traded for a 91 240sx with an rb25det swap. I did all the basic maintenance, cleaned up some of the wiring and am now looking to turn it up a bit. My previous customer had left me his original rb26dett ecu, and my s13 had a nistune type 2 board in the glove box when I got it. I also already have an ostrich emulator and burn2 chip programmer from moates.net. I've installed the socket in the ecu, but I would love some input on the best route to proceed. I've got a vci with an adapter for the nissan consult port, but to my knowledge no consult port was added to the vehicle with the swap, while if i am correct I should be able to just plug my ostrich in and load the nistune suite and get to work. 

Advice? 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/476241-rb25det-tuning-in-240sx/
Share on other sites

I would get a new Nistune board and install a consult port direct onto the ECU connector.

No need to burn chips and use emulators, not to mention you could implement full flex support and hook up a launch control switch as well.

I think it's not super easy to use the RB26 ECU on a 20/25.  Whilst the 20 and 26 ECU are super similar, the fact that the 26 expects to see 2x AFMs and 2x O2 sensors and shit like that makes extra challenges that you don't need.  The effort required to use it would be better spent elsewhere.  Definitely worth checking the Nistune forum (or hopefully Dose knows off the top of his head) what the state of play is with that.

I'm assuming the RB25 is running the original 25 ECU? So you can't use the Nistune board in that.  You'd need an RB20 ECU to go forward, and as Dose said, you'd still be better off buying a new Nistune board, with the right program in it.  Using the S13 one would require it to be redone anyway.

You will probably find it easiest and best (although not necessarily the cheapest) to use a Haltech or other similar plug-in ECU rather than having to mess about with all sorts of additional needs to get Nistune working.

I just re-read that after failing at skim reading LOL...

You're better off with a RB20DET ECU as it supports VCT, yes that's right RB20DET can control VCT on your RB25DET motor.

If you're hell bent on using the RB26 ECU on a RB25 that also can be done, however you lose the VCT capability. All you do is wire both AFM signals together so 1x AFM feeds both inputs, however best to check with Matt at Nistune if that's still required for the later/latest firmware for Nistune.

Thanks for the replies. I may have been confusing in my choice of words. The nistune board I have is the correct type 2 board for my application. I know I cant use the rb25 ecu, but in the meantime I tried out my previous customers ancient HKS Pfc f-con piggyback from his rb26 setup, and it plugs into and runs with the rb26 ecu perfectly fine. 

According to what I've found so far,  the rb26 ecu can be used successfully by bridging the maf and o2 inputs. As far as the VTC is concerned, any r32 ecu with part number 23710-04uxx or 11uxx and provisions on the board for the green diagnostic LED output can be used for vtc control, and the ecu I have fits the bill. 

I guess my biggest question is why I shouldn't use the ostrich 2.0 I've already got since its supported by nistune. 

Edited by turbotankshane

Having come from an S13, your Type 2 board is currently setup to run a CA18 or SR20 (or, given that you say 240SX, the truck motor that was in that).  It won't run an RB25 without having the correct programming dumped onto it.  Not just the maps, the entire ECU program (from an RB20, ideally, or even the RB26, conceivably).

There is no reason to use emulators &/or burners when you actually have Nistune......

Edited by GTSBoy

If a consult cable is $100 and the software is $200 for a license that's enough reason for me to roll with what I've got just to do some basic adjustments, hell I'm sure with a little time making an xdf I could use tunerpro rt and a modified rb26 bin to do what I needed to. It's a stock motor and turbo, I'm just looking to up the boost a little. I have absolutely no reason to put a Haltech in this car at this point in time. 

I'll get in touch with Nistune and see what I can come up with though. 

I think you're still misunderstanding. The type 2 board isn't for a ca/sr/ka ecu at all whatsoever. The board I have came with the car because the previous owner had purchased it specifically for an rb ecu, so it IS the correct board for an rb ecu. I'm looking on their website right now and for this bnr32 rb26dett ecu or even if I were to get any rb20det ecu, the type 2 board is still the correct board. 

There is a single stanza ecu for a ka that takes a type 2 board, but otherwise for a ca/sr/ka you're looking at a type 1 or type 3 board. 

Even if the previous owner had told nistune the wrong vehicle or ecu or something like that when he ordered it, I've got a base image programmer that I could put the correct base rom on the board with. 

Edited by turbotankshane

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...