Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Currently my R33 is running a blow thru z32 airflow meter in the cooler piping. Unfortunately this has damaged the sensor even though it is in a alloy housing. 

My car is running a PowerFC. Are my only options a link g4+ or Haltech Elite? Running these options are going to cost at least $3k with sensors/tuning. 

Turbo has a 4" inlet and tuner said is not possible to tune correctly due to the resolution or something along those lines. 

This is my second sensor and its getting to be a bit of a joke. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477190-how-to-delete-maf/
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Replace with R35 blade style AFM and build a cal curve for it in the PFC. It's doable, it's been done before.

Do you put the r35 one in the cooler piping or before the turbo? My tuner said due to turbocharger having 4" inlet on the intake housing it won't work due to resolution. Does this sound right? 

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

It can work in a 4" inlet, but you do lose resolution (you gain massive range on the flipside). But it can be troublesome to tune.

It is best put in the cooler pipe, after the cooler. Hot side is no good. Too hot.

R35 gtr sensor isn't designed to be used in cooler piping though? Is there any other options to delete MAF without spending big $ on a car worth 10k?

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

What makes you say that it's not designed to work in the cooler pipe? They work perfectly well there. They are massively robust (physically) compared to the old style ones (like Z32 etc).

Because in the r35 gtr they are used in the turbo inlet so are not under pressure from boost. 

Am I able to delete the MAF using a Haltech Platinum Pro or Link G4+? What'd be the cheapest ecu to get rid of it with?

On 5/29/2019 at 6:13 AM, GTSBoy said:

I for one, would never have considered putting a Z32 into the cooler piping. I wouldn't hesitate to do it to do it with a blade style AFM.

You can delete the AFM with any half decent aftermarket ECU and a MAP sensor.

What do you know is the cheapest ecu that can delete the maf sensor which works well with rb25?

[emoji6][emoji16][emoji106]

 

Please view this ad:

 

Rb wolf ecu,

https://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/traralgon/engine-engine-parts-transmission/rb-wolf-ecu/1219707349?utm_source=com.google.android.apps.docs&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialbuttons&utm_content=app_android

 

 

 

Download the application from the Google Play Store.

https://tinyurl.com/n4b7djy

 

Best to get a new expensive tech and make it a 13k car instead though.

 

Also you can use both i believe on a crossover so at a certain load level or pressure level the map takes over from the maf alowing maf to be res king at low throttle and map to res load like a champ.

 

 

 

 

8 hours ago, Blakeo said:

What do you know is the cheapest ecu that can delete the maf sensor which works well with rb25?

A Link ecu nowadays is over $2k

An R35 MAF is about $300

https://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/performance/electronics/listing-2165296325.htm?rsqid=df64a402735949a298abc4973537ce38-001

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...