Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And another syd west place: MRC Dyno performance - Castle Hill.

I agree Abo Bob and i guess thats the point of this thread, if not happy with the current one you can find the alternatives here.

In my case i'm looking for an alternative for UAS. Might try Unigroup, i heard only good things about them.

I got my previous car tuned at Procar in Dee Why twice and was the one that pointed them out to Bob.

They got a guy in to do the tuning of my car who has close affiliations with cosworth. He isn't just a nice guy that tunes the engine safely, he insists you sit in the car with him during the tune so you can ask questions and so he can ask you from time to time what boost, what power, what sort of reliability you are aiming at.

I've got another appointment with them when my GTR lands.

Heard that BD4's at Gladesville (not east or west or north, central I guess) had recently upgrade their Dynojet to run the latest Winpep 7 and the Dynojet is arguably the most accurate dyno in the world. All they use in the US is Dynojet, must say something. Friend of mine got his 33 GTST tuned last week and got 210kW at the rubber, only running 0.75 bar of boost on Optimax with EVC, HKS FCON V and HKS FMIC, HKS powerflow and exhaust and everything else standard. I guess that was quite all right. Only got charged $220 for tuning the HKS FCON, took about 3 hours.

This has turned into a good thread.

someonestolecc - I think he is saying that that place but not that guy tunes turbo cars. There actually was an r32 GTR parked in front of the dyno when I got there.

believer - just cos the seppos do a lot of something doesn't necessarily make it a good thing. Not having a go at anything else you said though.

I just contacted the Unigroup abt what time do they open and if they work weekends, via email coz i couldn't get thru to them by phone, and i got this response:

Our weekday hours are 6:30pm-10pm and our weekend hours are 1pm-6pm

Saturdays.

Thank you

Valent

Unigroup Engineering

Chassis Dyno Facility

Unit 17/17A Amax Ave

Girraween, Sydney

www.unigroup.com.au

Phone: (02) 9631 2470

Fax: (02) 9631 8306

Hmmm, do you find it weird? I don't know of anyone else with working hours like that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...