Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 21/01/2022 at 4:17 PM, GTSBoy said:

Doesn't rev to 12k , by the way. Typical American cock throttling.

Always, like how they talk in fly wheel horse power to sound like they're making big numbers.

On 1/21/2022 at 3:55 PM, vosadrian said:

I get that the RBs in NA form are not the best engines around. I'm not looking for the highest power NA engine around. We are really doing NA for sound and feel and we want to keep to the Nissan/Datsun family and we want to keep it straight 6. Obviously we could stick an E46 M3 engine in or something and that is a good NA straight 6. But we want to keep it in the family. Does that then leave just L series and RB series engines? Another point, is we want it EFI (I have worked a lot in aftermarket EFI and I enjoy working with it and tuning etc.). My take is that by the time you adapted an L series to EFI and modified it for good power, you would be down more $$ than doing the same with RB series. Have I got this wrong?

And we don't need huge power.... but we do want to optimise what we have. But not to 110%. I'm all for finding some easy extra revs with an oil pump upgrade and some decent cams and valve train... but I don't need fully lightened balanced for 12k RPM at very expensive $$. As I said, it is more about the sound and feel. But if we can spend a few $k on getting the bottom end to rev reliably and the top end to flow to good revs, we would go that far. Is RB the right choice for this? Is there another option I have missed?

As I said, I'm not trying to talk you out of it. Just pointing out that you should not get your hopes up that a small 6 cylinder twin cam is going to make it feel like a proper sports car. I have no doubt that if you pay someone big money they can be made to make good power. Look at the old Holden 202 - they are pushing well over 300HP out of those nowadays. But back in my day (the 80s) it was a struggle to get 200HP out of them. People learnt what to do to make them make power. But it costs.

There hasn't been a heap of development into making NA RBs make a lot of power, because.....the lure of the turbo reveals how poor the value proposition is. Yes, they sound bloody awesome revving to the moon through open ram tubes and long primary extractors. But the time taken to run from the bottom of the rev range to the top of the rev range reveals that they don't make a lot of power doing it. Listen too the Hakosuka video

 for the nearest example.

  • Like 1

So if I want to build an RB based NA engine, which (reasonably priced and accessible) head option is going to give me the best result? It seems the RB25DE NEO has small ports and may not be easily ported for the best result. I believe the non NEO heads are the same casting between turbo and NA? So would either of those options be OK... or better to go turbo as perhaps the valve springs are OK for cams? Or are NEO turbo heads a better option due to solid lifters, so better for high RPM?

If you're doing porting, it probably doesn't matter that the NA Neo ports start out small. It's just a bit more metal too remove - provided that the eater jackets aren't actually closer to the port walls, which is an unknown (at least to me).

Neo is simply better. Better combustion chamber shape, better valve train. Arguably better valve angle but I actually don't know what this does to the port shape around the short turn, so it could be a win-lose situation there.

But..... here we are talking about small differences. It's not as if there's 50HP available between your best option and your worst option. If it is more than 20HP I'll be very surprised.

Thanks for that. Who knows RB heads. Is Lewis engines a good option? Just looking for someone knowledgable who can set up porting and valve train optimised but at a fair price? Thinking I might send the heads somewhere to get them done. Possibly someone who might set up the bottom end also and supply a complete long motor. I might contact them first and make sure I am getting the right bits for them to work on.

Try Rams Head Service, but also be prepared to pay.

I got a quote to machine my old NEO head and convert to shimless and let's just say it was cheaper to source and another head, fit new shims and buckets it to with plenty of change left for strippers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...