Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All,

Currently getting a radiator w/ shroud and 16" brushless fan fab'd up. I will be using the sensor to switch on the fan. I will be using a stock thermostat(76.9c) with a 175-195f sensor switch.

I planned on getting the sensor thread bung welded to the lower half of the radiator near the outlet hose (mimicking the AC fan stock sensor switch location)

However, I've read much on that the switch needs to be mounted near the hottest point which would be near the upper hose.

Some of what I've read also states that it needs to be close to the thermostat. Most of that info is non-RB specific as some motors thermostat is located on the upper hose pipe.

Should the switch be close to the coolant temp sensor for thermostat??

Whats optimal when it comes to a RB?

Personally I would use your ECU to control the fan, the OEM water temp sensor on the outlet from the plenum would be the best spot to sample water temperature.

If you use a SSR or an OEM fan controller (from another car)you could even duty cycle your fan so it gently ramps in as water temperature increases and say goes from 30% duty at 75°C and to 100% by 85°C as an example. Far more sophisticated and superior than an on/off thermo switch.

Makes everything a bit more premium.

 

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Personally I would use your ECU to control the fan, the OEM water temp sensor on the outlet from the plenum would be the best spot to sample water temperature.

If you use a SSR or an OEM fan controller (from another car)you could even duty cycle your fan so it gently ramps in as water temperature increases and say goes from 30% duty at 75°C and to 100% by 85°C as an example. Far more sophisticated and superior than an on/off thermo switch.

Makes everything a bit more premium.

 

I thought about just doing the ECU route. With the Spal Brushless tech, the fan is basically variable speed on its own with the switch (low speed @175F /max @195F).

I also thought about getting one of the radiator hose sensor provisions to mount the switch, since it seems the upper is deemed the most optimal location.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Nice!

If that's the case, just install that sensor on plenum outlet. 

You're sampling water that is being expelled out from the motor, you would assume it's the best location.

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Nice!

If that's the case, just install that sensor on plenum outlet. 

You're sampling water that is being expelled out from the motor, you would assume it's the best location.

Thanks!

The sensor is 3/8 so i may not exactly get it on the plenum but its def going up top! I just found one of those hose adapter in 3/8 on the ebay.

I'll just plug the bung that they welded on the bottom and delete the OEM harness for the than AC fan sensor switch. The new fan is gonna do the job.

  • Like 1

If it were me, I'd just build a controller on an Arduino. Fit it with a little trim pot or two, put it in a sealed box, and use the sensor location in the rad tank. The trim pots would allow the on and off points to be adjusted, rather than relying on hard switching points. The logic in the controller could be as sophisticated or as simple as you like. You could even have extra RTDs or TCs looking at external air T, engine bay T, etc, to inform how hard to run the fan.

I'd see it as an opportunity to experiment with programming some fuzzy logic. Might turn out to be complete overkill, but good fun.

But, if you have the capacity to run it from the ECU, almost any other option is verging on silly. No extra sensors required, all sorts of additional logic available at the twitch of a mouse, etc.

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...