Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So, I'm not sure if I have an issue or not.
 
When I started removing the cylinder head for the head gasket job, I followed a manual I had for the Pulsar N16 which said to set piston 1 to TDC then holding intake camshaft with spanner, use breaker bar to remove intake sprocket bolt. Did that, removed the sprocket, did the exhaust, removed cams etc.. to where I am now.
 
Today I got my hands on Haynes service manual for the Nissan Pulsar N16 and while reading, the removal of the intake cams is different. The Haynes manual actually mentions something about using compressed air to engage/disengage a locking pin, then using a allen key, lock the pin in place. But it also says not to remove the allen key before installing otherwise it'll damage the pin & a new sprocket would be needed.
 
Well... I'm stumped here. I don't know what to do, how to check if there's issues, where to proceed.
 
I had hoped to have everything done in the next day or two but this may have set me back even longer.
 
Does anyone know what Haynes is talking about? What should I do at this point? How can I tell if this is damaged or re-usable?

cam sprocket removalNissan pulsar n16.pdf

 

[UPDATE]

So, my curiosity got the better of me. It's my biggest flaw imo. I pulled the VVT apart to have a look inside & see if anything's broken. I am really confused...

I expected there to be some sort of wound-spring creating a lot of tension inside hence why the 'pin' would shear. There's barely anything in here & nothing's under tension. The pin was in 'lock' position which I could pull out and move the internals. My mind is still boggled how these things work, why it's necessary to remove the sprocket the Haynes way & why Haynes would say the 'pin' would be damaged and shear if the allen key is removed while the sprocket it out of the engine 🤷.


Am I missing something? I'm not a smart person so I'm assuming I am missing a lot about this situation.. 🤔

 

IMG_20230804_220915.jpg

IMG_20230804_221553.jpg

IMG_20230804_221601.jpg

IMG_20230804_221615.jpg

IMG_20230804_221626.jpg

7 hours ago, LeWidget said:

 

[UPDATE]

So, my curiosity got the better of me. It's my biggest flaw imo. I pulled the VVT apart to have a look inside & see if anything's broken. I am really confused...

I expected there to be some sort of wound-spring creating a lot of tension inside hence why the 'pin' would shear. There's barely anything in here & nothing's under tension. The pin was in 'lock' position which I could pull out and move the internals. My mind is still boggled how these things work, why it's necessary to remove the sprocket the Haynes way & why Haynes would say the 'pin' would be damaged and shear if the allen key is removed while the sprocket it out of the engine 🤷.


Am I missing something? I'm not a smart person so I'm assuming I am missing a lot about this situation.. 🤔

 

IMG_20230804_220915.jpg

IMG_20230804_221553.jpg

IMG_20230804_221601.jpg

IMG_20230804_221615.jpg

IMG_20230804_221626.jpg

The Haynes manual is basically telling you to retract the locking pin in the VVT cam phaser and then advance the sprocket all the way to the limit of travel and use a pin to hold it there. Why it tells you that I'm not sure. Go by the factory service manual instead for your car/engine. It's possible you have to do the same procedure but I have literally never heard of anything like this when timing a VVT engine. You can verify that the pin is not ruined by checking that it is straight, no visible gouging on the surface finish, and no cracks or anything like that. The pin is designed to basically work such that when oil pressure is removed from the cam phaser it will naturally retard and hit the lock position at which point the spring pushes the pin into the hardened lock pin seat. Cam phasing is adjusted from there by using a solenoid that controls how much oil pressure goes to each side of the cam phaser. You can see a breakdown of how it works on a Toyota version of the same idea here:

 

Thanks Josh, much appreciated :)

It's getting clearer what these VVT gears are & how they function. As long as the solenoid is good & the oil passages are clean, the VVT gear-sprocket should function as intended?
I'm still boggled about what Haynes is saying regarding the damage to the pin & the pin sheering. Still has me a little concerned even though I can't see how it would sheer.
I might take everything apart tonight, give it a good clean, inspect & re-oil.


Regarding the factory service manual. The one I have seems to be a factory service manual for Europe, however, it says it was released in 2001, though my car is a late 03' built in Japan (imported to Australia), so I'm not sure if there's a newer / later release of the manual, or if it covers 'series 2' QG18DE, or if Europe models varies differently to Japan/Australia models. I've been looking for a different factory manual but no luck so far.

[EDIT] I took a photo of the compliance plate in the engine bay which has a model number stamped into it. Is anyone able to decode. Perhaps it would give more information on the engine or if anything's different with this variant ? CATARDAN16EMA-F---

 

factory manual cover.jpg

Edited by LeWidget
On 8/4/2023 at 11:23 PM, LeWidget said:

Thanks Josh, much appreciated :)

It's getting clearer what these VVT gears are & how they function. As long as the solenoid is good & the oil passages are clean, the VVT gear-sprocket should function as intended?
I'm still boggled about what Haynes is saying regarding the damage to the pin & the pin sheering. Still has me a little concerned even though I can't see how it would sheer.
I might take everything apart tonight, give it a good clean, inspect & re-oil.


Regarding the factory service manual. The one I have seems to be a factory service manual for Europe, however, it says it was released in 2001, though my car is a late 03' built in Japan (imported to Australia), so I'm not sure if there's a newer / later release of the manual, or if it covers 'series 2' QG18DE, or if Europe models varies differently to Japan/Australia models. I've been looking for a different factory manual but no luck so far.

[EDIT] I took a photo of the compliance plate in the engine bay which has a model number stamped into it. Is anyone able to decode. Perhaps it would give more information on the engine or if anything's different with this variant ? CATARDAN16EMA-F---

 

factory manual cover.jpg

When I check nicoclub for the 2005 Sentra factory service manual it mentions this step, so I would follow it.

image.thumb.png.2dc911fbbe623f065166a91554c5fa3b.png

Thanks Josh :). As the VVT /VCT is already off, I'll be sure to follow when re-installing. 👍

You would happen to know the torque requirements for the 3 bolts securing the VVT/VCT housing? I've looked in my Haynes manual & a Nissan Almera (Pulsar in Europe) factory service manual, but can't see anything, unless I'm searching the incorrect name. If the VVT has 3 bolts allowing it to be disassembled as shown, there 'must' be a torque specification to tighten them back up, no? 

Thanks again :)

Edited by LeWidget
14 hours ago, LeWidget said:

Thanks Josh :). As the VVT /VCT is already off, I'll be sure to follow when re-installing. 👍

You would happen to know the torque requirements for the 3 bolts securing the VVT/VCT housing? I've looked in my Haynes manual & a Nissan Almera (Pulsar in Europe) factory service manual, but can't see anything, unless I'm searching the incorrect name. If the VVT has 3 bolts allowing it to be disassembled as shown, there 'must' be a torque specification to tighten them back up, no? 

Thanks again :)

https://www.nicoclub.com/service-manual?fsm=Sentra%2F2005%2Fem.pdf

As far as I can tell there is no listed torque spec as it was not intended to be disassembled. It is probably either something like 7 ft-lbs or 12 ft-lbs. Assess what materials you're tightening into. If it's soft aluminum 5-7 ft-lbs is probably what you want.

12 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

https://www.nicoclub.com/service-manual?fsm=Sentra%2F2005%2Fem.pdf

As far as I can tell there is no listed torque spec as it was not intended to be disassembled. It is probably either something like 7 ft-lbs or 12 ft-lbs. Assess what materials you're tightening into. If it's soft aluminum 5-7 ft-lbs is probably what you want.

Thanks again Josh, much appreciate the information :) :91_thumbsup:.

I used a magnet on the sprocket and it looks like the section that the bolts thread into is machined from steel (magnetic). As I hadn't found anything on it, I was considering just tightening them to 10-12nm (7.3 - 8.8 ft-lb), but maybe I should aim for a higher torque being it's inside the engine?

Do you think the use of threadlocker (blue) would benefit ?

2 hours ago, LeWidget said:

Thanks again Josh, much appreciate the information :) :91_thumbsup:.

I used a magnet on the sprocket and it looks like the section that the bolts thread into is machined from steel (magnetic). As I hadn't found anything on it, I was considering just tightening them to 10-12nm (7.3 - 8.8 ft-lb), but maybe I should aim for a higher torque being it's inside the engine?

Do you think the use of threadlocker (blue) would benefit ?

Blue threadlocker + tightening by feel is probably the way to go then. You can feel fastener stretch. At first it will be relatively easy but usually you will hit a sudden increase in resistance. Once you get there don't go crazy with the force. A bit more is good enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...