Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I searched everywhere for a DIY on this, including in other languages for other R34-importing countries: Finland, Netherlands, France, Germany etc. and all I could find was a decades-old thread on a UK-based Skyline forum with incomplete/non-existent pictures. I then spoke with another R34-driving friend in Japan, a Finnish chap - also a member here - and he explained to me that making the beam "flat", as is accepted in many LHD countries was easy, and guided me through the process.

Last weekend, as the mad rush to make my car EU-compliant continued, I took a few pictures as I modded the headlights for EU compliance. The car will be taken to the port in Japan in a few weeks. 

The idea is that the bulb housing needs to have a piece of material added to it where it projects the beam upwards to the left side - consequently dazzling left-side oncoming traffic. The guy in the other thread explaining this process welded a small piece of steel to the housing, which is practically irreversible and invites potential for damage. The way my friend did it, and subsequently I have done it, is to add aluminium tape instead. 

With the headlights removed, and in a well-lit workspace. Remove the security bit and then the cover for the Xenon bulb:

image.thumb.jpeg.b8aff079b7112a0c04274018c597f93a.jpeg

Once removed, you'll need to unclip the bulb retainer and remove the 3x phillips head screws:

image.thumb.jpeg.00bd15fd9f7da6447175eccb85d23e6a.jpeg

Carefully twist and remove the bulb from the connector and set it aside in a clean, secure area:

image.thumb.jpeg.eb0cb2fc21e0e2c4bcd0a3a6963876a5.jpeg

With the bulb removed, you'll then be able to remove the bracket and retaining clip to access the bulb housing:

image.thumb.jpeg.7c6c506c2659b71ff269d9c2620a875a.jpeg

With the bulb housing out, you'll be able to see the right side is lower than the left side. This is the part that increases the beam output on the left side. Why does the right side increase output on the left side? The beam is flipped upside-down and right to left via the headlight reflector:   

image.thumb.jpeg.57e69e1eddc04ebd92a3b9903b03cf03.jpeg

This is the part where I had to have faith in that decades-old thread from the other forum. The previous poster claimed you had to add 4mm of material to the lower side of the housing, to block enough output to make the beam flat. As I don't have time to f*ck around, I'm just going by what he said. My friend told me he can't remember how much material he added. We'll find out later whether 4mm was sufficient.

Make sure you buy good-quality aluminium tape, as it gets hot in there. I added masking tape to the tape to mark it off in 4mm intervals across the width, then scored the tape - this will help in application - the length was 35mm: 25mm for the length across the light-exposed portion and 10mm as support on the bulb housing:

image.thumb.jpeg.8b9cde7b8d48c25c969db282df669891.jpeg

 Fold the tape evenly prior to application to ensure you get a straight edge:

image.thumb.jpeg.beb4d65fe3d9a3415f98aae6ad91a11c.jpeg

Clean the bulb housing with degreaser and apply the aluminium tape. Having scored across the tape, you should be able to align it "perfectly" with the bulb housing.

 image.thumb.jpeg.ade2c50ab17e826b68d8fc6a9f1c85fa.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.d152af6e76ae1f5cc78fb35a3cd7dbea.jpeg

Reintall everything in the reverse order, replicate the process on the other headlight, aaaand done.  Wish me luck in my next vehicle inspection.

image.thumb.jpeg.eda4c87da4ed6c321a5d28e28e9094ea.jpeg

Note: I had to remove the spade terminal on the bulb connector to get it sufficiently out the way. 

Note: You will be modifying the right-side of both bulb housings. Don't try to mirror this on the other side. 

Time taken: 30mins - 1 hour p/side. Plus whatever it takes to remove/install the headlights from the car.  

I will hopefully get a chance to check the beam this weekend at the shop when the windscreen gets replaced. I've got a before picture so will upload a before & after if I can get that image. 

  • Like 1
27 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Cross your fingers and hope that the adhesive on the tape is happy at the operating temperatures involved.

Yeah, I wondered this too. But the aforementioned Finnish friend ran this for some years (approx. eight years) in Finland and it was holding up fine when he sent the car back to Japan - fingers crossed. Either way, it's a damn sight easier than welding it up.   

Mother f*cker. Just got back from the shop, and will need to redo it most likely. I’ll try adding a 5/6mm (depending on how I feel) to the wall on the bulb housing this time. This is a note to all of you. 

02767FF3-E7BF-46F4-BC99-1F84EEE1745E.jpeg

Worth to mention the other problem at the time was the use of xenon headlight without washer/auto leveling above a given limit (2000 lumens IIRC).
I don't know if things have changed or not regarding that point.
Very interesting in knowing the size added mask to achieve a flatten beam !

20 minutes ago, wardiz said:

Worth to mention the other problem at the time was the use of xenon headlight without washer/auto leveling above a given limit (2000 lumens IIRC).
I don't know if things have changed or not regarding that point.
Very interesting in knowing the size added mask to achieve a flatten beam !

Cheers. What country does the xenon w/o washer restriction apply to? 
 

From memory, the R34s in NL - where I’ll be going - don’t have headlight washers. I know this is usually a requirement in the U.K. on cars I’ve bought there. 

There used to be a requirement in NL on cars from 2006 onwards equipped with xenon although I think this has also been scrapped by now, but as the R34 is pre 2006 headlight washers are not needed in NL if you have xenon headlights.

Also interested to know the final measurements that you end up with to get the correct beam as I have a new set of headlights that I will need to convert to LHD.
 

  • Like 1
On 10/17/2023 at 8:18 PM, iTzTMG said:

There used to be a requirement in NL on cars from 2006 onwards equipped with xenon although I think this has also been scrapped by now, but as the R34 is pre 2006 headlight washers are not needed in NL if you have xenon headlights.

Also interested to know the final measurements that you end up with to get the correct beam as I have a new set of headlights that I will need to convert to LHD.
 

Cheers. I found something similar to this (2009? For the U.K.) and deemed that enough reasoning to justify why the R34s in NL don’t have this feature. 

  • 2 weeks later...

I’ve added a 5mm wall and tried to match the curvature of the bulb housing. It looks a bit better now but there is still slight beam spillage which I’m starting to think comes from the shape of the reflector. 
 

I’ll leave it like this for now and see what they say in NL. 

F7A46CA4-2DE3-4518-AFC4-F349D57F6E24.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...