Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As Dose said before, if u want to spend cash do it on more value for money stuff.

But if u have the cash this is cool, but it’s designed to sit on top of the RB25 lower shell

 

IMG_0171.jpeg

Edited by Watermouse
  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

90mm throttle body

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

7 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

Edited by Watermouse
13 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

I'm running a greddy style plenum with stock throttle body on my rb30 (rb25 series 2 head) stagea, it is making 400kw through that.

There are plenty of ways to spend money on the car, you don't need to change the intake you have for 600hp

  • Like 1
18 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

11 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

Okay I must of got my letters wrong instead of hp  I’d like to make 450-600kw i know it’s quite easy to make it on an RB I already got the turbo for free so it’s brand new the aeroflow 62 .84 T51r mod already done T4 flange can I change it to a t3

 

but please tell me how 

Is there a reason why you want close to 600kW in a R32 GTS-t?

Have you thought about suspension work, subframe changes (from a newer car, offsetting it), diff choice, brakes, gearbox?

There's a high chance you're running a RB20DET gearbox which will not like close to 600kW being sent through it.

Also a 6262 won't get you close to 600kW.

5 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

@Dose Pipe Sutututu  thank you so much, understand what u mean and appreciate that info

I think way too many people get caught up in the whole bigger TB for more power, but that's only if it becomes a restriction.

In a FI environment, the TB size is not as sensitive, where as in a NA environment, you find with the throttle at 100% and if the plenum still registers a vacuum, then your TB is undersized and requires to be upgraded.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...