Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got off the phone with the guys at URAS in japan. They have a new item in their lineup...

flat_bootlid.jpg

Costs around $600 RRP + shipping, I can get some mates rates happening, and get it shipped down here and copied.

So for all of you guys who want flat bootlids here's the deal:

Step 1: Provide a non refundable $30 something deposit

Step 2: I get the original part down from URAS (no pun intended)

Step 3: I get copies made up for the people that provided the deposit

Step 4: You can buy a copy of the item minus the original deposit amount.

Benefits of getting a copy of this one as opposed to buying an east bear bootlid etc:

1) cheaper

2) its a spoiler not a replacement bootlid so its easier to add and less complicated to mould, therefore making the cost to replicate a LOT less than it would for a complete bootlid.

3) IMHO it looks nicer than the East Bear or C-West one

4) You have the option after installing it to remove it at any time and put a regular wing on, cos its just a glorified spoiler.

Also, depending on the number of people willing to put that initial deposit down, the amount will vary. I'll need to get somewhere around $600 for the original item plus shipping, so basically divide that amongst the number of people interested.

If you are interested, reply to this thread.

interested with cash waiting

as was mentioned above, when the copies are made, would it be possible to get a hole moulded into the spoiler for our existing spoiler brake light to go into?? i wouldn't mind paying a bit extra if we can get this done.

Will make inquiries into getting the original brake light moulded in. Are they different between the different series?

As for who gets the original, it'll be the guy makin the copies. I have an R32 so I have no need for it, and he wants to keep the original in case the mould needs to be remade. In exchange for this he'll sell the copies to the guys involved in the original group buy at cost price, which should be around $250-$300 (Depending on the cost to make the mould). Initial deposit will be around $30.

So say for example it costs $300 to make, you pay $270 to get it if you paid an initial deposit.

Lemme know what you guys think.

Spoke to the the fabricator, he said the stock brake light wouldn't fit the contours of the flat boot lid as the stock one has a bigger curve. He can graft a flat rectangular Hella LED brake light into it, but he said it would add tot he cost of the spoiler by about $100 since the lights aren't cheap. Also it'll mean 2 moulds have to be made for those that don't want the brake light.

However, seeing as most people have rear windscreen wipers, they won't be able to fit a brake repeater on the base of the window, they'll have to fit it at the top. And I don't think most people would be too keen on the taxi-look.

Your call guys.

Could the standard HL brake light be fitted INSIDE the spoiler and holes be moulded in the spoiler (round to match taillights?) so it can be seen, that way we can reuse the standard light and wiring and keep the cost down.

I am not interested at that price point. You can pick up better looking copies for less.

Thanks for your effort though.

cool, well hence the EOI, if people want it then I'll get it done for em, if it works out too expensive, meh :) Keep in mind this price he's given me is the max price its expected to be, it could (and most probably will) work out cheaper. Its better to overprice then drop the price, rather than underprice n then upset people by raising the price.

my car comes with a factory flat bootlid :rant:

spoke to him again about the brake light, he said it wouldn't be too hard to drill the bootlid and insert an clear LED array into it that lit up red. (He wanted me to do a DIY guide on it lol). So that's one possible way of doing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...