Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Excellent , I'd like to hear how it goes . I may have found an R32 25 lower half to work with . I gather you cut it off out past the rail mounts and weld on plates to match the throttle bodies profile , then drill and tap the through bolt holes , make port holes then bolt it up .

Chow A .

  • 3 weeks later...

Well I would like to throw a spanner in the works here.( have not read whole thread, but noticed comment about single throttle conversion)

Any modified car, no matter what it is, is only as good as it's weakest link.

If a car is setup for a particular purpose then compromises are made.

I am by no means an expert in these matters, but would like to add my opinion.

Often I have seen (& driven) modified cars that have been built with "killer" parts lists that "on paper" should kick ass. BUT, they have not been greater than the

"sum off the parts", in other words, they have been built with all the "name" bits & pieces, but the overall application has been overshot in some areas.

Massive top end power is totally useless on the street if mid range torque is sacrificed to find it. If you are building a drag car then it doesnt matter, but the street is where it's at.

For example - the latest engine build on my street GTR (& I hope it's the last) has been a realistic downgrading so I can actually use it on the street. I reluctantly swapped the HKS step proL 288 cams for a pair of much more sensible 272s.

With the 288s, the car was a total pig in traffic off the line & couldn't even sit happily at 60 unless I kept it in 2nd or 3rd gear. Now the car has much better bottom end response, still will pull well into the revs, & I can use the car.

It does has a single throttle conversion(85mm), & with the single turbo, custom valves, conservative tune at 1 bar on PULP, it makes 375rwkw(500hp) & is responsive, well behaved & just what I wanted.

Big number parts are fun to talk about, but what we all want is a reliable, fast street car. If a single throttle conversion is done in conjuntion with the RIGHT parts

and tuned accordingly then it CAN be an advantage.

I have seen articles on Jap GTRS that run low nines still using the original 6 throttle bodies & a std plenum!!! So go figure!

At the drags, who cares about mid range.

The race GTR has a single 100mm throttle body & 292 cams.

Boost will start around 6500rpm.

The engine is built & the car is nearly finished.

So close, yet so far away.

Cant wait to get it finished. Been a long time between drinks.

And I like a drink as much as the next guy!!!

I started this thread so I'll put it to rest . My original drama with the RB30 DET was clearence of the inlet manifold and the throttle body facing the wrong way . I guessed wrongly that the RB26 head and inlet system would cost a motsa . Since the RB26/30 have the same bore size and coolant passages getting the 26 head on a 30 block is easy (don't forget larger dia head bolts) . So for what I consider very reasonable money I bought a complete RB26 head/inlet system . So in other words I have the best performing factory option which solves the above probs as well . If I had grafted the GTR inlet system onto an RB25 (R32) head along with the GTR cams and springs it would have cost more for less performance . Also not having a RB25 bottom end to trip over helps .

Cheers A .

I started this thread so I'll put it to rest . My original drama with the RB30 DET was clearence of the inlet manifold and the throttle body facing the wrong way . I guessed wrongly that the RB26 head and inlet system would cost a motsa . Since the RB26/30 have the same bore size and coolant passages getting the 26 head on a 30 block is easy (don't forget larger dia head bolts) . So for what I consider  very reasonable money I bought a complete RB26 head/inlet system . So in other words I have the best performing factory option which solves the above probs as well . If I had grafted the GTR inlet system onto an RB25 (R32) head along with the GTR cams and springs it would have cost more for less performance . Also not having a RB25 bottom end to trip over helps .  

Cheers  A .

The right decision A, let us know how it goes. :D

this thread's got me thinking about what i should do when my motor goes back together.

ATM i've got an rb24det with standard bolt ons but to go back on it, is a k27, trust manifold and gate and a modded GTR manifold. mines alittle bit different though, its had the rb20det runners cut before the injectors and the gtr manifold has been cut and rewelded to erase the 6 throttles and keep the injector holes (uses 12 injectors, 6 gtr and 6 rb20), then the standard throttle has been mounted on the front.

now you've got me thinking i should leave the standard manifold on and dont worry about throwing the gtr manifold back on, do you think zoom lost all that power from the 6 throttle setup, or the whole design of the manifold (shorter runners, plenum size etc)?

this thread's got me thinking about what i should do when my motor goes back together.  

ATM i've got an rb24det with standard bolt ons but to go back on it, is a k27, trust manifold and gate and a modded GTR manifold. mines alittle bit different though, its had the rb20det runners cut before the injectors and the gtr manifold has been cut and rewelded to erase the 6 throttles and keep the injector holes (uses 12 injectors, 6 gtr and 6 rb20), then the standard throttle has been mounted on the front.  

now you've got me thinking i should leave the standard manifold on and dont worry about throwing the gtr manifold back on, do you think zoom lost all that power from the 6 throttle setup, or the whole design of the manifold (shorter runners, plenum size etc)?

I think 2.4 litres compared to 2 litres (as per the Zoom test) will make a lot of difference. The GTR inlet system is designed for 2.6 litres, so you are not so far away from its design parameters. I reckon it's a goer and you should use it. :D

I have a question though, why did you go away from the mutliple throttle bodies?

I have a question though, why did you go away from the mutliple throttle bodies?

it was done in japan, to be honest i dunno why they did it! probably wanted the 6 extra injectors more, or mabye they did the same as zoom, tried it with them on, saw a loss so went to a single throttle?

:headspin:

well think about it this way.. you can either get an rb25det from a 33 thats done probably 80,000 ks or you can build a fresh motor with .4 of a litre more (than the rb20). personally i'd prefer the fresh motor with Tomei forgies!

but on another note the cars 16 years old with 60,000 kms, so it could of been done back in the 90's when rb25s were still fairly new and pricey.

anyway i've got the best of both worlds! a huge turbo and a stroker! :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...