Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I came across an article in Zoom no 62 titled Killer Taxi Part 3 . This is basically about someone who put an RB20DET into a VR Commodore and I assume in part 2 has fitted an RB26 6 throttle inlet manifold . Does anyone have Zoom 60/61 that could tell me how it was done as I would like to do this on a non VCT RB25 head .

Thanks in advance Adrian .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49852-rb26-inlet-on-rb20det/
Share on other sites

Are there any pics available from the Zoom article ie of the adapter plate . If not does anyone have picks of the RB26 head (inlet side without manifold) . Or failing that are there any pics of the R32 RB20/25DE inlet manifold gasket to compare to the RB26 gasket ?

Just for the record I was a Fitter/Machinist before Locomotive Engineman so am not scared of filing / grinding / milling / drilling - just can't weld aluminium myself , but others can so please guys how do I fit the GTR inlet on R32 RB25DE head . I am not concerned about the two litres because mine will go on top of three . Correct me if I'm wrong but I think RB20DET and R32 25DE use the same inlet manifold stud pattern so obviously can be done .

Chow Adrian .

As best i can gather, what they have done is cut the flange off the RB20 manifold where it bolts to the head, in your case you would want to be chopping off the flange from the RB25 inlet manifold.

Then the flange section that the 6 throttle bodies bolt to, cut the std RB26 head flange of, then weld the RB25 flange to it. You may need to match port the flanges etc, but an experienced aluminium welder shoudlnt have too many probs doing it. That way you dont have to muck around with head water galleries etc, and you can use the RB26 injector location etc etc.

But i ssuspect that it may not be the case here as he wants to put it into an RB25, though by the time you buy the manifld fiddle and setup, i dare say it may be worthwhile going to thr RB26 head, and sell the RB25 head to help fund it...modding the exhaust manifold is no biggie

Thanks Roy . In the pics I have the top water outlet (thermostat housing ?) looks different to RB20/25 (R32) . If thats the case they must have used a modified RB26 injector flange bit complete with the thermostat section and recarved it to suit . Someone here suggested they used an adapter plate . If anyone knows which workshop made it I am all ears .

Cheers A .

Hi DP, I will post up the pictures when I get home. The dyno tests confirmed that the RB20 with RB26 inlet lost power EVERYWHERE, up top, down low and in the middle. It was SO BAD they couldn't drive it without stutter and stalling at low revs, as in traffic and parking. As I PM'd, there is more to an RB26 than just the inlet. It's a package, so don't expect to steal one bit and get a perfect result. :cheers:

I would also be extremely keen to see the results, as I haven't had any dramas with this whatsoever and my top end power increased dramaticlly...

Can it come down to how the job was done to which type of turbo is used? I am no professional but I am really surprised at how negative some people are towards this...

Are there any other references where people have been disappointed with the results as I mentioned I have had no problems whatsoever with mine and the top end increased majorly...

I had a look at a 25 DET and a 26 head today . I can only hope that the R32 25 head is closer to the 26 especially as it does not have the 33's telegragh pole sized solenoid sticking out the side . I need to see a 20DET head to compare to a 26 manifold . The front water outlet is longer on the 26 head .

On the exhaust side no 3 and 5 ports have their studs diagonally opposite to RB26 . The 25 DET uses 10mm studs where the 26's are 8mm . No doubt adapting the 26 head to the factory single turbo manifold would involve the use of an adapter plate and oversized stud holes in the head . I think Joels DIY RB30DET PDF has a picture of an RB20DET head with the 25DE inlet gasket on it .

Chow for now , Adrian .

Some info on the RB20 with RB26 inlet as per Zoom Magazine edition 64 and edition 62;

RB20withRB26Inlet.jpg

This picture shows the RB26 plenum being test fitted up to the cut and welded RB20 inlet. The throttle bodies go between the RB26 plenum and the modified (shortened) RB20 inlet but are not shown in this photo.

RB20inletwithRB26Plenum.jpg

This is a picture of the RB26 plenum, RB26 throttle bodies and RB20 shortened inlet on the RB20.

RB20withRB26InletonEngine.jpg

This picture shows the RB20 with RB26 plenum, RB26 throttle bodies and RB20 shortened inlet in the car.

RB20withRB26InletinCar.jpg

The best thing you can do with a GTR intake and throttlebodys is change them for a good single setup.

I suppose I will get sworn at again, but I can't resist it ....

This car has the standard RB26 inlet and throttle bodies with a (larger) Greddy plenum and it runs 9's.

BrisbaneStreetMachinesR32GTREngineBay.jpg

It also has AFM's and uses a standard Power FC, gotta love it for killing a few myths. :D

PS; Photo courtesy of HPI #47, thanks Ben.

Then again the Top overseas ones have single and some guys run faster than that N/A with push rods and a carb so does that mean we all should fit carbed V8s.

I agree with Munro it would be a damn sight cheaper, but not half as much of a challenge. :jk:

I guess if I had a GTR and wanted to drag it (what a waste, no corners) then I would spend my time elsewhere until I got into the 9's. Why spend money on stuff that you don't have to? :confused:

Theo's car actually is quite a good example of a package, it ONLY has ~650rwhp, H pattern gearbox, ~2.6 litres and AMAZINGLY uses Federal street tyres. But 9.8 at 145 mph proves what can be done if the WHOLE of the car (including the driver) is up for it.

If Theo is reading, nice reaction time :rofl:

Sorry guys but the concept has now got me in , thank you SK for the pics . As I said I've looked at the RB26 manifold , just need to see a non VVT 25 manifold/head or gasket . SK the 1st picture didn't show very clearly the modified section of the RB20 manifold . I was looking at an RB20DET in a Commode Door and it had what looked like a spacer plate between the inlet manifold and the head . Does the 32 25 head have this too . Also in your pics the water outlet angled forward like an RB26 , so 20 and 26 must interchange ie to get around the plenum . I really should look at a Nissan R32 Engine Workshop Manual but I could not download it from this site .

Cheers A .

P.S Am still looking at RB26 heads but the block mods and exhaust side mods still require some work . Its a big if but if I can find the bits for reasonable money I'll grab them . The exhaust porting does look better and of course the better cams and springs would be good . With "pre loved" GTR heads is it common to have to replace valves and guides or are they pretty durable things .

Chow .

Look at any decent race car - multi throttles. Gotta love response. Big single is a huge wank. maybe for tope end drag cars, but who wants one?

The only problem I have found with the RB25 lower runners is that 3&4 dip down to make them equal length which makes it hard to put a flange on them. Still deciding on which way to go at the moment in terms of attaching the throttle bodies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...